Construction workers build BART’s transbay tube in 1970. (Courtesy Bechtel Corp.)

Construction workers build BART’s transbay tube in 1970. (Courtesy Bechtel Corp.)

Plan for second BART Transbay Tube takes step forward

The Bay Area’s second BART Transbay Tube may still be a glimmer in planners’ eyes.

The Bay Area’s second BART Transbay Tube may still be a glimmer in planners’ eyes — not to mention decades and billions of dollars away from reality — but on Thursday afternoon the project took one small, but measurable, step forward.

The BART Board of Directors approved a $50 million contract for up to 10 years to consultants HNTB Corporation, of Oakland, to advise and guide planning for the future Transbay Rail Crossing.

HNTB’s strategic advising will help BART understand “how to set up the framework for a project this complex,” Ellen Smith, BART’s strategic planning manager, explained to the board Thursday.

“BART hasn’t done anything this big since the construction of the original system,” she said. “We really need their advice on other mega-projects, [to see] how they were handled.”

Smith warned that the project will involve many stakeholders spread across the Bay Area’s 21-county “mega-region.” The consultants will help BART staff understand how to set up an approval process across such a wide swath of public entites, to set up an “evaluation system” for their progress, and how to manage planning stages of such a large project.

“Back-office stuff,” Smith said.

HNTB’s consultant contract will also go before the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority’s next meeting, according to Capitol Corridor staff.

Importantly, while many may know the proposal more commonly as the “Transbay Tube,” partly because BART’s only operating transbay crossing is also an underwater tube, current plans also consider scenarios to cross the bay that don’t rely on tubes. Plans discuss both BART-specific tracks in a rail crossing, as well as a standard-gauge rail that would allow Capitol Corridor trains to use the crossing.

The agency, therefore, has opted to ditch the term “Transbay Tube” and call the project the new Transbay Rail Crossing.

The need for a second Transbay Rail Crossing is great, BART staff said Thursday. By 2030, high economic and population growth in the Bay Area may strain local transportation agencies’ ability to commute people across the San Francisco Bay, according to agency projections.

That’s where the second Transbay Rail Crossing comes in.

BART has $110 million toward planning the crossing from its Measure RR bond, which was approved by voters in 2016. Roughly $50 million in Metropolitan Transportation Commission-managed Regional Measure 3 funds will also go towards planning, in addition to $1 million annually from the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority.

About $50 million of that funding will go to HNTB Corporation, which beat out competitors for what may be one day considered a historic contract.

BART netted five proposals from strategic consulting firms to help guide the Transbay Rail Crossing’s planning: HNTB Corporation, Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., LiNC Partners, and WSP USA Inc. All ventures had offices in Oakland, according to BART. Their proposals were reviewed by a selection committee assembled from BART staff, as well as representatives from the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority, which manages Capitol Corridor train service from San Jose to Sacramento.

HNTB and BART have worked jointly on other projects — the corporation was the principal designer of BART’s eight-mile San Francisco Airport Extension, which included designing both the South San Francisco BART Station and San Burno BART Station, according to HNTB.

joe@sfexaminer.com

Transit

Just Posted

A man walks past the main entrance to the Hotel Whitcomb at Eighth and Market streets on Wednesday, Oct. 7, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Closing hotels could disconnect hundreds from critical health care services

‘That baseline of humanity and dignity goes a long way’

Dreamforce returned to San Francisco in person this week – but with a tiny sliver of past attendance. (Courtesy Salesforce)
Dreamforce returns with hundreds on hand, down from 170,000 in the past

High hopes for a larger Salesforce conference shriveled during the summer

The remnants of trees burned by the Dixie Fire near Antelope Lake, Calif., on Friday, Sept. 3, 2021. (Christian Monterrosa/The New York Times)
California’s wildfires invisible effect: high carbon dioxide emissions

This summer California fires emitted twice as much CO2 as last year

Latinos are dying at a lower rate than white and Black people in California. However, Latinos have had the sharpest increase in the death rate in the last month, rising from 2.4 deaths per 100,000 people in August to 4 per 100,000 in September. (iStock)
Who’s dying in California from COVID-19?

In recent months, those who are dying are younger

The numbers show nearly 14 percent of San Francisco voters who participated in the Sept. 14 recall election wanted to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from elected office. (Shutterstock photo)
(Shutterstock photo)
How San Francisco neighborhoods voted in the Newsom recall

Sunset tops the list as the area with the most ‘yes’ votes

Most Read