The seven-member court unanimously upheld a 2011 San Francisco law that requires telephone companies to obtain a permit before placing equipment on utility poles on public streets and sidewalks. (courtesy photo)

High court says cities can consider visual effects of wireless equipment on streets

The California Supreme Court ruled in San Francisco Thursday that cities have a right to regulate the placement of wireless telephone equipment on utility poles to accommodate aesthetic concerns.

The seven-member court unanimously upheld a 2011 San Francisco law that requires telephone companies to obtain a permit before placing equipment on utility poles on public streets and sidewalks.

The city ordinance requires a heightened consideration of aesthetic factors in certain areas, including residential districts, historicdistricts and scenic streets, before a permit can be granted.

T-Mobile West Corp. and two other wireless companies that challenged the ordinance argued it violated a state law that allows telephone companies to construct lines and install equipment along public roads.

The state law says the installation must be done in ways and in locations that do not “incommode the public use of the road.”

T-Mobile argued that the measure allowed restrictions only when needed to prevent installations from impeding traffic.

But the high court said the word “incommode” includes having a negative effect on peaceful enjoyment of public roads and sidewalks, and that San Francisco therefore had a right to consider visual effects.

Justice Carol Corrigan wrote, “The city has inherent local police power to determine the appropriate uses of land within its jurisdiction.That power includes the authority to establish aesthetic conditions for land use.”

San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement,”Private companies don’t have free rein when it comes to using a publicresource. San Francisco doesn’t prohibit this equipment from being installed. We’re simply requiring companies to take reasonable steps to minimize theobtrusiveness of their installations.

A T-Mobile spokesman said the company has no comment.

Just Posted

Safe parking site for homeless who live in their vehicles proposed near Balboa Park BART

Facility would offer social services, security, bathrooms for overnight parkers

Police testify in ‘Rideshare Rapist’ case as defense seeks to toss evidence

Attorneys for Orlando Vilchez-Lazo allege officers illegally obtained DNA

Office of Racial Equity to address The City’s deep inequities

San Francisco is poised to pass legislation that would create The City’s… Continue reading

Voters to decide on increased campaign finance disclosures, new limits on contributions

Ballot measure would restrict donations from developers with projects under consideration by city

Queen, renewed again, rocks San Jose

Band enjoys popularity in wake of hit 2018 biopic

Most Read