Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis speaks during a media conference Thursday in Oakland. With the Oakland Raiders’ long-term plans still up in the air, team officials announced Thursday afternoon that the team had agreed to a one-year lease extension to remain at the O.Co Coliseum for the 2016 NFL season. The deal also includes options for the 2017 and 2018 seasons, Raiders owner Mark Davis said at the press conference. (Ben Margot/AP)

Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis speaks during a media conference Thursday in Oakland. With the Oakland Raiders’ long-term plans still up in the air, team officials announced Thursday afternoon that the team had agreed to a one-year lease extension to remain at the O.Co Coliseum for the 2016 NFL season. The deal also includes options for the 2017 and 2018 seasons, Raiders owner Mark Davis said at the press conference. (Ben Margot/AP)

Raiders agree to lease extension that keeps them in Oakland for at least one more year

Four weeks after being stymied in their effort to move to Los Angeles, the Raiders agreed to a one-year lease extension to remain at the Oakland Coliseum on Thursday.

Raiders owner Mark Davis had been mulling multiple options to move his team since being passed over by the NFL’s other owners to relocate the Raiders to Southern California.

When asked if he would still make overtures to other cities about moving the Raiders, Davis said in a news conference, “This is about today and the future and the lease we just signed with the city of Oakland. It gives us an opportunity to work on a permanent facility for the Raiders here in Oakland, and that’s where we’re going to keep them.”

The St. Louis Rams were approved to move to Los Angeles in January, while the San Diego Chargers have an option to join the Rams. At the time, Davis bemoaned that his team “came in third” in the race to LA.

The agreement with the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Joint Powers Authority guarantees that the Raiders will play the 2016 season in the same stadium they have called home since 1995. It also carries two one-year team options.

“I’ll term this as a win-win situation,” Davis said. “For the city of Oakland: The mayor when she presented in front of the National Football League owners, she said that the one thing they needed was time and that if they had more time, they could get something done with the Raiders in Oakland. And for the Raiders: It gives us some certainty for this season and some flexibility in the coming seasons.”

Davis noted that having a stadium deal in place for the upcoming season was crucial for the team as it heads into free agency, which begins March 9.

The deal still needs the approval of the Oakland City Council, Alameda County Board of Supervisors and NFL owners.

The Raiders retained real estate executive Larry MacNeil as a consultant to the Oakland stadium development team to negotiate with the city and county governments. MacNeil was previously the chief financial officer for the San Francisco 49ers and had a hand in the development of Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara.

S.F. Examiner Staff Writer Jacob C. Palmer contributed to this report.

AFC Westalameda county board of supervisorsbay area developmentlarry macneilLos AngelesMark DavisNational Football LeagueNFLoakland city councilOakland Raidersoakland stadiumoakland-alameda county coliseum joint powers authorityRaidersSan Diego ChargersSt. Louis Rams

Just Posted

Salesforce Tower and several other buildings in downtown San Francisco can be seen through the fog; climate scientists report that The City’s beloved mascot may be on the decline. (Courtesy Engel Ching)
Is San Francisco losing its fog? Scientists fear the worst

This isn’t just an identity crisis for San Franciscans. It’s an ecological problem

Outside Lands boasts high-quality food and drink from dozens of purveyors, and many are local.<ins> (Courtesy Outside Lands)</ins>
Outside Lands is for food lovers

85 food vendors, 40 wineries, 30 breweries make the festival nourishing to gluttonous

California Highway Patrol officers watch as Caltrans workers remove barricades from homeless camp sites as residents are forced to relocate from a parking lot underneath Interstate 80 on Monday, May 17, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
San Francisco’s broken promise to resolve homeless encampments

‘There is an idea that The City is leading with services, and they are not’

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at San Francisco’s Department of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Gabriela Lopez, Alison Collins and Faauuga Moliga were sworn in to the Board of Education on Jan. 7, 2019. The election date for their possible recall is Feb. 15, 2022. (Ida Mojadad/S.F. Examiner)
The silver lining of San Francisco’s ‘recall fever’

Recalls are an expensive but valuable amplifier for everyday people

Most Read