An aerial view of the Sacramento - San Joaquin River Delta (Photo courtesy Shutterstock)

Environmental review docs released for controversial Delta tunnel plan

Thousands of pages of environmental review documents were released today on the controversial plan to build massive tunnels beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to transport water to central and southern California.

The final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed WaterFix project were both posted online today following 300 days of public review, 600 public meetings throughout the state and 30,000 public comments on the draft versions.

The $15 billion plan would involve digging the two 35-mile long tunnels to transport water from the northern portion of the Delta and deliver it elsewhere in California.

Once complete, it would provide water to 25 million people and thousands of businesses from the Bay Area to San Diego and supply water to 3 million acres of farmland.

Proponents say it would protect water supplies from sea level rise, earthquakes, floods and levee failure.

Advocates say that it is the most environmentally sound way to ensure that Californians have consistent access to water, but the plan’s many opponents say that it is at best unclear what environmental impact such a massive project would have.

The opponents argue that the volume coming from the twin tunnels could significantly drain the Sacramento River, exacerbating existing problems of saltwater intrusion into the Delta and imperiling fish populations.

The completion of the environmental review documents does not mean the project has been approved. Further biological opinions are expected to be completed early in 2017 and the plan still needs to be approved by state and federal environmental regulators.

Advocates hope for construction on the project to begin in 2018. Gov. Jerry Brown, who has been a vocal advocate of the proposal, said in a statement today that the environmental review has been extensive and the project is essential for the state.

“This project has been subjected to 10 years of detailed analysis and more environmental review than any other project in the history of the world,” Brown said. “It is absolutely essential if California is to maintain a reliable water supply.”

But opponents with the advocacy group Restore the Delta said today that regulators still need to take a careful look at the extensive documents released today.

“How thoughtful of Delta Tunnel lead agencies to dump this document on defenders of the San Francisco Bay-Delta estuary just before the holidays,” Restore the Delta executive director Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla said.

“We will begin digging through the information, evaluating agency replies to public comments included in this document, engage in the process moving forward, and prepare for litigation if required,” she said.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Ronen says $100M service expansion is ‘going to fix’ SF’s mental health crisis

Compromise mental health plan has backing of mayor, full Board of Supervisors

Civil liberties lawyer files to take on Pelosi

A San Francisco-based civil liberties lawyer, progressive advocate, DJ and poet is… Continue reading

Supes sound off against bill increasing housing density near transit hubs

Senator Wiener calls resolution opposing SB 50 ‘little more than symbolic political theater’

Eun Sun Kim named San Francisco Opera music director

Korean conductor’s skyrocketing career includes engagements across the world

Most Read