We have a right to know what’s in our food, vote yes on Prop. 37

Big companies are working very hard to limit your knowledge about what goes into your food.

Proposition 37 is a chance for Californians to send them the message that clear, truthful labeling is a must.

Prop. 37 would require labeling of genetically modified foods. Although some parts of the legislation are vague, including sections governing regulation of the measure if approved by voters, it would nonetheless give people the right to know what they are ingesting.

The makers of genetically modified organisms say they are not harmful, and there is certainly insufficient research on the subject. But if such foods pose consumers no harm, then there should be no harm in labeling the products containing them.

Consumers deserve the information needed to make informed decisions about what to eat. The only viable choice today for people who wish to avoid genetically modified organisms is to eat a fully organic diet containing no processed foods. But this is not viable for people without convenient access to such food or those on a low income — our most-vulnerable population when it comes to matters of food and nutrition.

Other industries have fought similar labeling requirements in the past, saying they would be onerous to implement in just one state. But that is a poor argument for any company with nothing to hide. Companies selling food outside California can henceforth provide them with this same level of disclosure.

Prop. 37 is not perfect and does not address the myriad labeling changes that truly ought to be adopted so that all consumers can make informed decisions about food. But it is a step in the right direction and sends food companies a clear message that they need to hear.

editorialsOpinionprop 37San Francisco

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Superintendent Vincent Matthews said some students and families who want to return will not be able to do so at this time. “We truly wish we could reopen schools for everyone,” he said. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFUSD sets April reopening date after reaching tentative agreement with teachers union

San Francisco Unified School District has set April 12 as its reopening… Continue reading

Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed legislation intended to help California schools reopen. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Newsom signs $6.6 billion school reopening legislative package

By Eli Walsh Bay City News Foundation Gov. Gavin Newsom and state… Continue reading

Recology executives have acknowledged overcharging city ratepayers. (Mira Laing/2017 Special to S.F. Examiner)
Recology to repay customers $95M in overcharged garbage fees, city attorney says

San Francisco’s waste management company, Recology, has agreed to repay its customers… Continue reading

A construction worker watches a load for a crane operator at the site of the future Chinatown Muni station for the Central Subway on Tuesday, March 3, 2021. (Sebastian Miño-Bucheli / Special to the S.F. Examiner)
Major construction on Central Subway to end by March 31

SFMTA board approves renegotiated contract with new deadline, more contractor payments

Most Read