Voters on Brown’s side on public pension reform

Jerry Brown made a rare gubernatorial appearance this month before a joint legislative committee that was delving — with obvious reluctance — into whether California’s public employee pension benefits should be overhauled.

While seeking his second stint as governor last year, Brown had pledged pension reform and has since offered a 12-point overhaul that attempts to strike a middle ground between the defenders of the status quo and the radical changes that outside groups want.

State and local pension costs have been rising, due to sharp increases in benefits in the last decade and declines in the pension fund investments that were supposed to pay for those benefits at no cost to taxpayers.

The Legislature’s majority Democrats are clearly reluctant to enact more than superficial pension reforms because they are utterly beholden to public employee unions for campaign support. Many, indeed, are either former government union members themselves or were handpicked by union leaders.

Brown knows that, of course. He knows that he was also dependent on union campaign money last year. He knows that a big reason he couldn’t cut a budget and tax deal with Republicans this year was that unions were dead-set against the GOP’s pension reforms.

But Brown also knows that public pension reform strikes a strong chord with voters, especially during a period of economic malaise when education and other public services are being cut and when they are being asked to pay more taxes to shore up those services.

Brown told legislators, therefore, that if they want voters to approve higher taxes on next November’s ballot, they must prove that they are being tight with the public’s money, and that means they must make a significant dent in unfunded pension costs.

Brown finds support for that message in two recent statewide polls that legislators will ignore at their peril.

Last week, a Field Poll found that voters’ views of public pensions have evolved, that increasing numbers now see them as too generous, and that Brown’s approach enjoys strong support.

This week, a Public Policy Institute of California poll echoes those findings, with 83 percent of Californians seeing public pensions as a problem. Strong majorities believe that employees should pay more and that traditional “defined-benefit” systems should be changed to a “defined-contribution” system for new workers, similar to private workers’ 401(k) plans.

Perhaps most important, while union leaders resist such changes, PPIC found that strong majorities of public employees themselves favor them.

Persuading voters to pay higher taxes would be difficult, but if the Legislature tries to slough off pension reform, or enacts only token changes, it will give tax opponents a potent weapon.

Dan Walters’ Sacramento Bee columns on state politics are syndicated by the Scripps Howard News Service.

Dan WaltersOp EdsOpinionSan Francisco

Just Posted

ose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014. 
Rose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014.
Willie and Rose: An alliance for the ages

How the Mayor and Chinatown activist shaped San Francisco, then and now

San Francisco supervisors are considering plans to replace trash cans — a “Renaissance” garbage can is pictured on Market Street — with pricey, unnecessary upgrades. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco must end ridiculous and expensive quest for ‘pretty’ trash cans

SF’s unique and pricey garbage bins a dream of disgraced former Public Works director

Giants right fielder Mike Yastrzemski is pictured at bat on July 29 against the Dodgers at Oracle Park; the teams are in the top spots in their league as the season closes. (Chris Victorio/Special to The Examiner)
With playoff positions on the line, old rivalries get new life

Giants cruised through season, Dodgers not far behind

Golden Gate Park visitors may take a survey about options regarding private car access on John F. Kennedy Drive, which has been the subject of controversy during the pandemic.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Your chance to weigh in: Should JFK remain closed to cars?

Host of mobility improvements for Golden Gate Park proposed

Drivers gathered to urge voters to reject an initiative that would exempt Uber, Lyft, and other gig economy companies from state labor laws, in San Francisco in October 2020. (Jim Wilson/New York Times)
What’s the role of unions in the 21st century?

As membership declines in California, economic inequality increases

Most Read