Vote yes on Prop. I; no on Prop. G

Two ordinances on next month’s municipal ballot, one to establish an Office of Small Business as a city department and the other to pay for refurbishing the Golden Gate Park stables, feature innovative funding mechanisms that try to limit the blank-check nature of many city initiatives.

They are both well-intentioned efforts aimed at a legitimate and demonstrated need. But voters need to make hard choices when faced with competing funding needs, and only one of the two measures, to establish the small-business office, deserves support.

That measure, Proposition I, allocates $750,000 for the first year of operation for the Office of Small Business. The office would be charged with helping businesses of fewer than 100 employees, mainly by operating a Small Business Assistance Center. That center would provide merchants with information on permit and licensing requirements, government contracting bid processes, legal compliance issues and “green” or sustainable business practices.

A current office of small business, which supports the Small Business Commission, has two staff members and serves a limited function. Prop. I would put a greater emphasis on helping merchants by increasing the staff and creating more of a one-stop-shopping atmosphere for questions and paperwork.

It’s a good idea. Small businesses are the lifeblood of The City, with more than 100,000 of them providing more than 300,000 jobs and serving as the engine for the local economy. But The City has over the years sent mixed messages to these businesses by entangling them in red tape, larding them with fees and taxes, and creating legislation without bothering to learn how it affects them.

Prop. I also makes good fiscal sense — ifpassed by voters, the general fund outlay of $750,000 is only guaranteed for one year, meaning backers would have to justify the new office’s existence each year. We expect they will be able to do that, with business people making it known that City Hall had become a more helpful, hospitable place for the motivated individuals who drive The City’s economy and only ask for a fair shake. Vote yes on Prop. I.

Proposition G would establish a matching fund to pay for the renovation, repair and maintenance of the Golden Gate Park horse stables, which are owned by The City but have been closed since 2001. Under Prop. G, The City would put a dollar into this fund, up to a limit of $750,000, for every three dollars in private donations.

Supporters speak convincingly of the need for a variety of recreational opportunities for our city’s children. But we are not convinced that The City should be in the specialized business of running horse stables, or that $750,000 of taxpayer funding couldn’t be spent for more pressing needs. We recommend voters vote no on Prop. G.

General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Health care workers would be the first group in the state to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. (Go Nakamura/Getty Images/TNS)
Hope on the way: Here’s what to know about California’s COVID-19 vaccine plan

The first batch of doses could hit the state as soon as early December

The Big Game was played Friday at Memorial Stadium in Berkeley. (Shutterstock)
Stanford blocks extra point to stun Cal, win 123rd Big Game 24-23

The 123rd edition of the Big Game featured a number of firsts.… Continue reading

Psilocybin magic mushrooms (Shutterstock)
‘Magic mushrooms’ moving into the mainstream

Efforts to decriminalize psychedelics could follow several different paths

The 2020 Census has concluded taking responses sooner than expected. (Courtesy photo)
What does California have to lose if undocumented immigrants are excluded from the census?

By Kim Bojórquez The Sacramento Bee If The U.S. Supreme Court rules… Continue reading

Those who stick around San Francisco on long holiday weekends can enjoy a slower pace, uncrowded streets and beloved institutions like cable cars. <ins>(Kevin Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
These empty San Francisco streets: A holiday dream

We’re here because we can be, and because we have nowhere else to be

Most Read