Understanding all the facts about the uninsured

President Barack Obama is going for broke on health care. He and his Democratic allies call for controls on insurance companies, mandates and penalties on individuals and employers, new excise taxes on insurance, drug and medical device companies, and the creation of a new ­government-­­run­ insurance plan.

To support his sweeping makeover, Obama and other liberal Democrats repeatedly point to the 46.3 million uninsured Americans. According to annual data released last month by the Census Bureau, the number of uninsured increased by 600,000 in 2008. By contrast, America lost an average of 700,000 jobs a month in the first three months of this year.

A careful examination of the data, however, reveals that Obama and his allies are misrepresenting the problem of the uninsured. Democratic plans would not come close to driving the number of uninsured to zero. At best, only about 29 million would be covered.

Fixing existing government programs and creating targeted programs to improve access to health care would be far more effective.

Health insurance does not equal health care in America. This fact is lost on lawmakers and health care activists who actually have health insurance but is understood well by many low-income Americans who lack insurance and who rely on affordable clinics for care.

A federal law called EMTALA prohibits anyone from being denied care whether at an emergency room, a community hospital or a community clinic.

Many uninsured Americans were able to obtain affordable care, despite the complaints of politicians to the contrary. Last year, the uninsured paid $30 billion out of pocket for health care. That may sound like a lot, but it averages out to a mere $647 per person.

The Census report makes headlines each year. But media accounts tend to wait until the fine print to acknowledge that the report surely overstates the number of uninsured, due to complications with self-reporting and statistical sampling.

The Census states that 46.3 million Americans were uninsured at some point in 2008. Yet, 17.8 million of the uninsured earn more than $50,000 annually. It’s likely that many of them — particularly the 9.7 million that make more than $75,000 a year — have chosen to forego coverage.

Such behavior is common among Americans between the ages of 19 and 29, who tend to be healthy and have no assets to protect. Therefore, they don’t see the need to spend their income on expensive monthly insurance premiums.

Democrats often demonize the young invincibles as parasites who transfer costs to the insured. Yet the Congressional Budget Office finds that “the effect of uncompensated care on private-sector payment rates appears to be limited.”

If there’s a cost shift, it’s from Medicare and Medicaid, whose ­government-set rates are far below the freely negotiated rates that prevail in the private sector.

The data shows that 7.3 million children lack insurance. This would be shocking and unacceptable — but fortunately it’s not true.

First, insurance isn’t access to care, and these kids have plenty of that. More to the point, most would have insurance if their parents signed them up for programs for which they’re already eligible.

The Georgetown University Health Policy Institute estimates that seven in 10 uninsured children already qualify for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, Medicaid or both. And the federal government already approved an additional $32 billion to help expand SCHIP earlier this year.

It’s not just children who are neglecting to take up government offers of taxpayer-supported insurance. According to the National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation, roughly one in four Americans without coverage is already eligible for government-provided care.

Before adding yet another ­government-run insurance scheme to the mix, policymakers should ponder why current programs are undersubscribed. It’s probably a combination of lack of need and the fact that the existing safety net of clinics and pay-out-of-pocket doctor visits serves them well.

Many doctors refuse to take patients covered under programs like Medicaid and SCHIP because of low government reimbursement rates. In Massachusetts, 20 percent of those now enrolled in Commonwealth Care, a free or subsidized insurance program, are having a hard time finding a doctor because of the low reimbursement rates.

Advocates for the poor complain that care was, in some instances, less expensive and more available before the 2006 state law that forced people to buy insurance. Instead of learning from this example, President Obama and his allies want to expand the Massachusetts experiment nationwide.

Then there’s the touchy immigration issue, both legal and illegal. About one in five of the uninsured — 9.5 million people — aren’t technically Americans. Most taxpayers are understandably concerned about extending government-subsidized insurance to illegal immigrants.

All told, roughly 8 million Americans genuinely cannot afford coverage. These are the individuals that reform should aim to help. The best way to accomplish this goal is to ensure that all Americans have access to low-cost, high deductible, catastrophic insurance plans that protect them from financial ruin in the event of a health crisis.

Individuals should be able to purchase insurance with pretax dollars just as those who have employer-provided insurance do.
We should also allow people to purchase health insurance across state lines. There’s no reason a 25-year-old man in New Jersey should have to pay nearly six times as much as a 25-year-old man in Kentucky for the same policy.

But these reforms are not what the president and liberal Democrats in Congress have in mind. By exaggerating how many Americans are in need of coverage, they’ve set the stage for an unprecedented — and unnecessary — level of government intrusion into health care that will lead to larger deficits, higher taxes for the middle class, increased costs for coverage and lower-quality rationed care for all Americans.

If they have their way, we’ll eventually be enrolled in a single-payer system where government is the only insurer — “Medicare for All.”

Sally C. Pipes is president and CEO of the Pacific Research Institute. Her latest book is “The Top Ten Myths of American Health Care: A Citizen’s Guide.” Follow her on Twitter @sallypipes.

General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott listens at a rally to commemorate the life of George Floyd and others killed by police outside City Hall on Monday, June 1, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Will the Biden Administration help SF speed up police reform?

City has struggled to implement changes without federal oversight

Lowell High School (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Students, families call for culture shift at Lowell after racist incident

District to explore changes including possible revision of admissions policy

Alan Wong was among California National Guard members deployed to Sacramento to provide security the weekend before the presidential inauguration. (Courtesy photo)
CCSF board member tests positive for COVID-19 after National Guard deployment

Alan Wong spent eight days in Sacramento protecting State Capitol before Inauguration Day

Due to a lack of votes in his favor, record-holding former Giant Barry Bonds (pictured at tribute to Willie McCovey in 2018) will not be entering the National Baseball Hall of Fame in the near future.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Ex-Giants star Barry Bonds again falls short of Hall of Fame

After striking out yet again in his bid to join Major League… Continue reading

San Francisco firefighter Keith Baraka has filed suit against The City alleging discrimination on the basis of race and sexual orientation.<ins></ins>
Gay black firefighter sues city for discrimination

A San Francisco firefighter who says he was harassed and discriminated against… Continue reading

Most Read