Trump’s asylum reforms will deport Bay Area asylum seekers infected by COVID

By Amanda Bhuket

While our national attention has been consumed by the myriad health and safety issues related to the coronavirus pandemic, nationwide protests against police brutality, and the use of force against peaceful protesters by unidentified federal immigration agents, the Trump administration has been playing fast and loose with our asylum system.

Since shelter-in-place began, the Department of Homeland Security has used the pandemic as a pretext to effectively close the southern border to asylum seekers through a rarely-used public health statute. While doing nothing to protect asylum seekers, border officials, or the general public, the shutdown poses dire consequences for the thousands awaiting their right to seek asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border. The COVID-induced border closure – which public health experts have condemned as unjustified and unnecessary – has since been extended indefinitely and has resulted in the automatic expulsion of over 40,000 asylum seekers since March.

Now, the Trump administration wants to dismantle our asylum system even further by codifying these inhumane policies permanently into law. The proposed change will allow for the automatic denial of asylum to any individual in the U.S. who has contracted the virus — and for the automatic denial at the border if they hail from or have passed through a country where COVID-19 exists.

As an immigration attorney with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area who specializes in asylum law, I have a front row seat to how these policies would be devastating for asylum seekers in the Bay Area and beyond. Nearly every single individual seeking asylum would be threatened with expulsion under these new regulations, violating our duties under domestic and international law.

My clients, most of whom never would have made it to the Bay Area under the current border shutdown, have continued working at their jobs in the service industry throughout the pandemic in spite of the higher risk of infection among black and brown communities. And it’s not like they’ve had a choice. Being that asylum seekers are ineligible to receive public benefits, my clients have no other option but to find work in order to provide for their own basic needs — even if it means doing so without authorization, and even if it means putting their lives on the line to do so.

Most of my clients are from Central and South America who arrive here after long and arduous journeys to escape violence, persecution, and torture seeking asylum from these dangerous conditions. The ramifications of being sent home are deadly.

The proposed rule won’t do anything to protect our nation’s public health. It is simply another attempt by this administration to deny asylum seekers the protections they deserve by any means necessary. Such a rule would represent the height of hypocrisy for a country with the highest number of confirmed coronavirus cases worldwide. While the presence of the virus can easily be detected through testing, the spread avoided through quarantine, and hopes for a vaccination continue to grow, such a drastic measure is completely unnecessary and belies an underlying animus toward asylum seekers that has been at the forefront of this administration’s immigration policy since the very beginning.

Perhaps even more menacingly, the proposed rule is written in such a way that it could be applied more broadly to other medical conditions in the future, including treatable conditions like gonorrhea, syphilis and tuberculosis.

This is not who we are as a nation nor who we should aspire to be. While California has led the nation in supporting the rights of undocumented immigrants by declaring itself a sanctuary state, the title does little to protect the thousands of asylum seekers in the Bay Area community from the draconian measures taken by this administration to rewrite our asylum laws.

We must continue fighting for asylum seekers in our community on all fronts. The public can submit comment to oppose this rule by August 10th. Congress must call on the administration to lift the restrictions at the border, resume the processing of asylum seekers waiting for an opportunity to submit their claims, and demand that the administration rescind the proposed rules affecting asylum seekers. The lives of thousands of asylum seekers, many of them Bay Area residents, depend on it.

Amanda Bhuket is the senior immigrant justice attorney at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area (LCCRSF).

Just Posted

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Most Read