Transit crisis in San Francisco

“S.F. seeks to encourage more transit-oriented developments,” The City, Nov. 29
Transit crisis in San Francisco

Joshua Sabatini provides a nice summary of what The City’s transportation planners want to do to reduce traffic congestion in San Francisco. The problem with their plans is that they won’t work. What is being proposed is akin to trying to fly an airliner using just the ailerons. What’s currently in vogue in San Francisco illustrates what’s wrong with City Hall’s response to its growing transportation crisis.

Most transportation planning are left to people who are well-intentioned but inexperienced. As a result, the proposed solutions tend to be half-baked and over-simplified:

“San Franciscans drive too much; we must walk more.”

“The restraints on parking will ease traffic.”

“More people should ride Muni.”

“We need more bicycle lanes.”

All of these warrant discussion and consideration, but none come even close to fully addressing the real problem. If people are to leave their cars at home, there will have to be non-automotive travel alternatives that work. Here are some considerations that tend to get shoved under the rug:

• Good decisions are not made by the seat-of-the-pants. One has to ask: What works; what doesn’t? What has been shown to work elsewhere? What is cost-effective? What are the alternatives? These essential elements of good planning tend to get lost in a seemingly endless series of politically inspired “bright ideas.”

• Thanks to an extremely ill-advised decision in the mid-1990s, the Muni Metro Market Street subway’s peak period carrying potential is now only 40 percent of what it used to be. The resulting overcrowding deters tens of thousands of would-be subway riders. Can this be fixed? Yes. Is it being fixed? No.

• San Francisco has 425,000 registered vehicles. Many of these cars remain parked at home during weekdays and an even greater percentage are seldom if ever used on crowded downtown streets. But 280,000 cars from the south crowd onto San Francisco streets every day. This means that the heavy congestion on many San Francisco streets comes more from Peninsula cars than San Francisco cars. City Hall has ignored this problem for years. Is there a solution? Yes. Is it being addressed? No.

The Bay Bridge operates at peak capacity during commute hours. Unfortunately, those hours are steadily increasing, which means that the East Bay’s impact on traffic congestion in San Francisco is also steadily increasing. Another solvable but largely ignored problem.

• To introduce competition and up the ante, some functions currently left to public agencies could be turned over to private companies, operating under short-term, performance-based contracts.

Gerald Cauthen
Oakland

Just Posted

Vaping proponents sue SF over language for November ballot measure

Proponents for a measure backed by E-cigarette maker Juul Labs Inc. that… Continue reading

Presidential candidates, national leaders make their case at DNC meeting in San Francisco

Factions of the Democratic Party and the broader progressive political movement faced… Continue reading

City cuts to long-term mental health beds prompt protest

Elected officials, hospital staff call move to short-term beds for homeless ‘short-sighted’

SFPD sergeant accused of pulling false fire alarm at Pacifica police station

Sgt. Maria Teresa Donati under investigation after meeting on homelessness disrupted

Pelosi comes out against JUUL ballot measure

Local Democratic leadership largely united in opposition to attempt to overturn vaping ban

Most Read