Tensions between San Francisco residents and police are continuing to grow in the wake of a civil trial ruling last week that the four police officers who killed Alex Nieto in 2013 did not use excessive force. (Mike Koozmin/2011 S.F. Examiner)

Telling the truth about police brutality in San Francisco

About a year and a half ago, I was in Ferguson, Mo., where I listened to articulate young people, sometimes sobbing, as they talked about their abuse at the hands of local police. I listened to moms, also in tears, as they told how helpless they felt watching what law enforcement was doing to their kids.

Last week, as I sat in the courtroom watching the trial of the four officers who killed Alex Nieto, the faces I had seen in Ferguson came back to me. As the story of Nieto’s death was told, and photos of his bullet-riddled body were projected onto a screen, I could see the tears on the faces of his parents and friends — tears remarkably similar to the ones I had seen in Ferguson months before, full of grief and shock, frustration and outrage.

In last week’s trial, a largely white, all-suburban jury decided the officers were not using excessive force when they killed Nieto in a hail of 59 bullets as he walked, with his hands in his pockets, in Bernal Heights Park. The verdict came as San Franciscans are still raw from the video of the execution-style police shooting of Mario Woods in the Bayview. And it came one year after police fired six fatal shots to the back of my neighbor, a young Guatemalan immigrant named Amilcar Perez Lopez, when he was running for his life.

If Alex, Mario, Amilcar, and so many others were isolated stories, it would be bad enough. But these are part of a racism and a cruelty going back decades in our city’s law enforcement culture.

When I’ve discussed Perez Lopez’s killing with Latino families in my neighborhood, I’ve been saddened at how many simply took it for granted that rogue officers could so brutally kill this young man without consequences. After two weeks of paid administrative leave, these officers simply went back to regular duties. For many of the Mission’s Latinos, such police abuse and subsequent impunity are a tragic fact of life.

In such a climate, can we even hope to re-establish trust and mutual respect between law enforcement and the community? Is reconciliation even possible? Maybe not. Unless, that is, we can get to the truth. As Archbishop Desmond Tutu once noted, no genuine reconciliation is possible unless we tell the truth.

At this moment in San Francisco, truth telling might involve our having the backs of young people of color who bravely come forward with their stories of police abuse. It might also mean supporting courageous officers who break their code of silence to tell what they know from within the Department.

And it might mean demanding, as the people of South Africa once did, that the police tell the truth about its rogue officers. Sadly, the San Francisco Police Department has not always done this.

In Perez Lopez’s case, as facts from two independent autopsies and the testimonies of eyewitnesses have surfaced, Chief Greg Suhr has told three different — and implausible — stories to keep his officers from being held accountable. In the case of Woods, whose brutal death we saw on video, Suhr expects us not to believe what our own eyes tell us. And in Nieto’s case, it took a judge’s order before the chief finally released the names of the shooting officers. Despite the recent verdict of the largely white suburban jurors, there are now stronger suspicions than ever of police brutality and a coverup in Nieto’s killing.

The U.S Department of Justice could help us get to the truth in these tragic deaths — but only if we demand a full civil rights investigation. Sadly, this is a great deal more than the DOJ has offered thus far.

In this painful and bloody year in our city, genuine reconciliation between law enforcement and our communities might still be possible. True, the integrity and courage it requires in telling the truth may sometimes border on the heroic. But do we have an alternative?

Fr. Richard Smith is the Vicar of St. John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in San Francisco’s Mission District where he has worked for immigration reform for several years.Alex NietoAmilcar Perez-LopezbrutalityFergusonMario WoodspoliceRichard SmithSan Francisco

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Music venue owners warn ‘hospitality and entertainment are dying’

Industry leaders plead with city, state for help

Advocates call for permanent moratorium on ‘poverty tows’

Ron Trathen hates change. He recalls moving around a lot as a… Continue reading

Anti-police protester sues over arrest at 2019 Pride Parade

A protester whose arrest at San Francisco’s 2019 Pride Parade intensified pressure… Continue reading

Veritas offers to forgive unpaid rent, but tenants are wary

Calls for rent forgiveness have been answered, but with some caveats. The… Continue reading

Dozens gather for candlelight vigil to honor victims in Beirut explosion

Dozens of people gathered at Rincon Park on Thursday evening to show… Continue reading

Most Read