Sentence shows need for probe

Former Milberg Weiss class-action securities attorney William Lerach was sentenced Monday to two years in federal prison and two years of probation for conspiring to obstruct justice in an illegal kickback scheme prosecutors called a “criminal enterprise” begun in 1979.

The kickbacks went to a stable of lead plaintiffs who in return recommended Milberg Weiss as lead counsel. Lerach’s sentence is absurdly lenient, considering what he and his former law partners did to the nation’s legal system. Lerach claims kickbacks were commonplace among class-action litigators when he was practicing. “Everybody was paying plaintiffs,” he said in a letter inadvertently made public by his own attorneys last week.

This should trigger a wider-ranging federal investigation of the plaintiffs’ bar, if indeed such a probe is not already being conducted. Senate and House Democrats, many of whom in years past received multiple campaign contributions from Lerach and others at Milberg Weiss, could demonstrate a laudable independence by opening a congressional inquiry.

Federal prosecutors estimate that more than $200 million in legal fees went to Milberg Weiss as a result of kickbacks in at least 150 cases. So the overall cost to shareholders, investors and the public in lost jobs and diminished investment portfolios may never be quantified.

Worse was the willful abuse of the court system by Lerach and two other Milberg Weiss attorneys who have also pleaded guilty in the case. They took advantage of litigation rules that awarded lead counsel status to the first firm that filed a case. Having ready-made plaintiffs on call made the firm millions of dollars until a 1995 law reduced the early filing advantage.

The final irony here is Lerach’s request to serve part of his prison sentence at home so he could teach legal ethics at his alma mater, the University of Pittsburgh law school. He would teach via teleconference from home at no cost to the school.

And Dean Mary Crossley thinks Lerach is just the fellow for the job, telling the judge in a letter that “despite his serious transgressions — indeed, at least in part because of them — I believe he could productively spend his time and talents teaching our students about the need always to practice ethically and within the strictures of the law, the pitfalls attorneys face when they breach high ethical standards, and the steps they might take to avoid his fate.”

Dean Crossley added that “members of our legal ethics faculty view the proposed involvement of Mr. Lerach as offering a unique and powerful educational opportunity for our students.”

Sounds to us like the students aren’t alone at Pitt in needing instruction on legal ethics.

General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Pier 39 aquarium staff furloughed during coronavirus — but what about the fish?

Aquarium of the Bay raising funds from public to keep up operations during shutdown

Ride-hail drivers left idling by coronavirus shutdown

Bay Area ride-hail drivers are among those who have been hit hardest… Continue reading

Navigation shelter resident tests positive for coronavirus

Homeless advocates repeatedly warned about an outbreak in congregate settings

CCSF taps first Asian American woman to lead as interim chancellor

City College reached a settlement with former Chancellor Mark Rocha after an abrupt departure

Plummeting Bay Area bridge traffic finally levels off

All told, weekday Bay Area traffic volumes are down by half, which has remained consistent from March 23 through this week.

Most Read