Ripping EdFund’s golden parachute

This state has already been billed for too many closed-door, bloated payouts to higher education executives, thanks to the University of California trustees. With a still-rising $15.2 billion deficit estimated for California next year, the last thing taxpayers need is a $3 million to $4 million severance agreement for the seven top managers of EdFund.

Fortunately, a prompt and justifiably irate response by legislators from both parties put this boondoggle on indefinite hold. Instead, on Thursday the EdFund board opted to look into whether any action should be taken to retain key managers if the nonprofit is privatized — which is much closer to what it should have done in the first place.

A copy of the proposed EdFund severance package obtained by the press indicated that the seven top executives — who are paid between $171,000 and $339,000 yearly — were seeking two years of salaries, bonuses and health coverage if they departed when the nonprofit was sold. They also wanted tax reimbursements and $20,000 apiece for job-seeking costs.

EdFund is a state-operated nonprofit established in 1997 to administer California’s federal student-loan program. Its $27 billion portfolio insures loans for about half the state students receiving federal aid. If students default, EdFund takes charge of collection efforts and processes federal reimbursements for state expenditures.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the legislative leadership agreed during last year’s budget negotiations to put EdFund up for sale to private investors, estimating that the price could go as high as $500 million. But just this Wednesday, the governor announced that any sale would be postponed until the 2009-10 fiscal year.

Assembly Judicial Committee Chairman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento, distributed a letter blasting the EdFund board for “the proposed size of this compensation package [which] is unreasonable on its face and therefore contrary to law.” Jones also castigated the board for holding closed-door meetings about the “excessive” severance despite warnings from attorneys of the Student Aid Commission and the Office of Legislative Counsel.

State Senate Republican leader Dave Cogdill and other GOP senators also issued a statement calling EdFund’s actions “entirely inappropriate.”

EdFund President Sam Kipp claimed the private severance negotiations were “a retention strategy, not an exit strategy” just intended to retain valuable managers throughout the nonprofit’s sale transition. That explanation seems to run remarkably backwards, considering that the package would reward executives for leaving, not for staying.

EdFund’s attempted golden parachute giveaway looks highly embarrassing when exposed to public awareness and the entire confidential procedure is a perfect example of why strongly enforced sunshine laws are so vital to good government.

General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Planning Commission greenlights 1,100 unit Balboa Reservoir project

Development near CCSF expected to include 50 percent below-market rate units

Breed announces timeline for when SF’s businesses can reopen after COVID-19 shutdown

Restaurant advocacy group wants The City to allow indoor dining sooner

Trump signs order targeting social media companies

By Chris Megerian Los Angeles Times President Donald Trump signed an executive… Continue reading

CCSF puts Fort Mason campus on the chopping block

Faced with severe budget cuts, community college preparing to end decades-long lease

Neighbors sue city over safe camping site planned for Stanyan Street

A group of Haight residents filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking a federal… Continue reading

Most Read