Remember BART fatalities

Labor pact puts end to BART strike,” The City, Tuesday

Remember BART fatalities

Even though there is now a tentative deal yet to be voted on by the unions and the BART trains are now rolling again, it's at the expense of two track engineers who were killed Saturday when struck by a BART train during the strike.

Regardless of which side you were on during the negotiations between BART and the unions, the long, drawn-out mess held Bay Area commuters hostage.

The loss of two human lives during this strike, and the grieving of the two engineers' children and family members, should prick the conscience of both sides in this BART debacle. We, the public, also grieve with the families.

Neither side won. We all lost.

Anh Le, San Francisco

Props. B and C would set a bad precedent,” Opinion, Thursday

B and C bad for waterfront

I couldn't concur more on The San Francisco Examiner's recommended no vote on Propositions B and C. San Franciscans would be absolutely crazy to let this developer reap such a huge windfall at the ballot box at the expense of The City.

In general, I'm in favor of additional housing around the downtown area, but there has to be limits on that housing expansion. In simple math, the contractor stands to gain a windfall of $120 million over and above the $15 million it has said it will donate to The City if it gets new height allowances and the on-site affordable housing stipulation is also lifted.

Right now, The City is getting zero dollars for the commercial value of the new added height, which I would value at $25 million. The affordable housing is worth 25 units at $5 million each for a total of $125 million.

If B and C are approved by voters, all contractors will want new building heights and the waterfront will soon look like Hong Kong. What puzzles me more are Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom's and Mayor Ed Lee's endorsement of B and C. These two politicians have more than 50 years of enforcing our building code requirements between them but have inexplicably canned their principles to support B and C and the economic hosing The City will take if they pass.

Politicians who seemingly forsake their principles should be reason enough to stop this developer's attempt to circumvent the Planning Commission via the ballot box.

Vote yes on B and C and San Franciscans lose $135 million and get an ugly waterfront, or vote no and The City will still get a fair financial settlement and a reasonable development in accordance with the decisions of the Planning Commission.

R.E. O'Leary, San Francisco

Sharp park course run down,” Letters, Opinion, Thursday

Golf courses don't add up

Letter writer Jillian Smith is dead wrong about her facts on the Recreation and Park Department's golf course resources. In 2002, The City approved an ordinance to create the Golf Fund, in which all revenues from all golf courses owned by San Francisco are pooled in the fund. All expenses for all golf courses including Sharp Park are to be paid from that money according to a formula.

Rec and Park has gotten away with failing to comply with the law. There has never been a true audit of the $13 million fund by an independent non-city auditor, nor has Rec and Park done its job of requiring an annual report of all the Golf Fund's revenues and expenses at a public hearing.

For the record, I don't play golf. I just watch out for the public's money, especially when those in charge fail to do their jobs and uphold the law — as in this case.

Nancy Wuerfel, San Francisco

letters to the editorOpinion

Just Posted

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Most Read