Port should select wisely when choosing company to operate cruise ship terminal

The sleek new cruise ship terminal on Pier 27 is a welcome addition to the waterfront. Ideally, it will be a boon to The City and the region as it brings in visitors from around the world who might not otherwise visit or spend their money here. But it also has the possibility to become a giant albatross around the neck of the Port of San Francisco if not properly managed.

The new James R. Herman Cruise Terminal will become The City’s primary berthing spot for cruise ships in 2014. It will replace Pier 35, which is little more than a converted warehouse. The Port has long sought to upgrade its terminal since its capacity and docking capabilities became increasingly dated as cruise ships increased in size — especially the ones that travel internationally. Yet earlier terminal projects fell apart for varying reasons.

Operation of the new 60,000-square-foot terminal will make it possible for more cruise ships to berth in San Francisco, and Pier 35 can continue to be used as a backup. And projections suggest that more ships are on their way. The Port schedule shows 65 cruise ships docked in 2012. This year that number is expected to be 66, and next year’s schedule shows 74 arrivals.

The Port Commission is currently choosing between two companies seeking to oversee operations at the new building, including the cruise business as well as events and parking operations. In presentations to the commission Tuesday, both companies acknowledged that events are a crucial part of making the site profitable. The difficulty is in coordinating such events amid the arrivals and departures of swarms of tourists. Lost days and hours can drag down profits.

The Port should select an operator who will be able to steer ship traffic to The City. Up to 120 cruises a year could be handled here, and more ships would mean more people spending their money in San Francisco. The company selected should be held accountable for its promises. Years down the road, city officials shouldn’t be put in the position of wondering what happened to all those ships they were expecting.

But international tourism is a finicky business. The operator of the Pier 27 terminal also needs to demonstrate what can be accomplished if cruise ship business declines for some reason. The site-rental business would be a buffer if cruise business increases, but it could suddenly become critical to covering the Port’s costs if ships decided to head elsewhere or not sail at all — both variables that could be out of local officials’ hands.

On the balance, we believe the investment in the new facility was a worthwhile expenditure. But the best proof of that would be for the new facility to make money from its cruise ship traffic. That seems feasible if the always-tricky waters of management are navigated well.

editorialsOpinionPier 27Port of San Francisco

Just Posted

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

National Weather Service flood watch in the San Francisco Bay Area for Sunday, Oct. 24, 2021. (National Weather Service via Bay City News)
Storm updates: Sunday was wettest October day in San Francisco history

Torrential rainfall causes flooding, triggers evacuations in burn areas

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A collaborative workspace for a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) in Coordinape is pictured at a recent blockchain meet up at Atlas Cafe. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Business without bosses: San Francisco innovators battle bureaucracy with blockchain

‘The next generation will work for three DAOs at the same time’

Most Read