Social distancing is difficult for those living on the street, and conditions in city shelters are ideal for spreading airborne diseases. Kevin N. Hume/ S.F. Examiner

Opinion: One-hundred medical experts advocate for more hotels for the unhoused, and quickly

Increase our hotel capacity so people can truly socially distance

By San Francisco United in Crisis

As San Francisco’s shelter in place order was being enacted, The City had about 30,000 vacant units and 42,000 empty hotel rooms, while at least 8,000 people remained unhoused, either in congregate shelters or on the street.

Currently, The City is moving into hotel rooms only those unhoused San Franciscans who test positive for coronavirus or those who show symptoms of COVID-19. This is a vital start. But it is not enough.

Individuals carrying the coronavirus may be contagious for several days before showing symptoms or show few to no symptoms at all. Moreover, the rate of spread for the virus, represented by COVID-19’s basic reproduction number (which ranges from two to five, depending on the study), suggests that if even a single person brings the disease into a shelter, an average of two to five people will be infected, each of whom would, in turn, infect two to five more.

If we only provide proper accommodation to people after they are noticeably ill, the spread could become exponential.

This is why we believe our city and state must prioritize making sufficient hotel rooms available to allow every unhoused person the opportunity to socially distance fully.

The compromised health already suffered by many unhoused people put them at especially high risk for COVID-19. Common conditions among this population include diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune conditions, chronic illnesses and increased age. Respiratory illnesses such as pneumonia and tuberculosis disproportionately harm the unhoused community. COVID-19 is also a respiratory illness. And among vulnerable populations, its mortality rate is particularly high.

The nation of Italy is currently experiencing the world’s highest mortality rate for the disease, at around 8%, in part because its population is on average more advanced in years. Yet the impact on Italy could pale in comparison to that on our vulnerable unhoused population.

Social distancing seems to be the only way to protect everyone from such grim statistics. This is why The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended staying away from others who are sick and avoiding crowds.

We know the virus spreads via airborne droplets produced when an infected person coughs or sneezes. The conditions in The City’s congregate shelters are ideal for the spread of airborne droplets, putting guests at high risk of infection. While spacing beds out and emphasizing good hygiene are important to slow the rate of transmission, they are not the ideal.

The ideal is housing the unhoused. It is vital that we make enough housing units available with all haste, both to avoid mass illness and to provide this most basic human need. Lack of housing is ruinous to health. COVID-19, which is more dangerous to those already vulnerable, underscores this for us yet again.

Homeless adults with medical and behavioral health needs must also be provided nursing and social work support. We need to prevent isolation, even while socially distancing, and tend to chronic medical needs lest they deteriorate. Therefore, various types of housing, in addition to hotels, should be made available for high-need individuals — from single rooms to board and care facilities, and small living arrangements with common areas — so that small groups can avoid total isolation and medical staff can efficiently support their needs. It will be critical to provide enough staffing to provide such services.

We need to recognize that the landscape of public health has changed completely. We need to put our resources toward the interventions that work. In Wuhan, where the first outbreaks are now relatively contained and being studied, experts have found that infection rates only drop enough to mitigate spread when true social distancing is enacted.

The Bay Area seems to be taking this lesson to heart. Courageous front-line workers, city officials and unhoused people themselves are doing their best to protect everyone, and they deserve our unending gratitude.

But in a time when we ask schoolchildren to stay home, congregants to worship alone and workers to prioritize their health, we need to create the same safety for our neighbors experiencing homelessness. It is not only a matter of public health, it is a matter of social justice, a step away from the enduring inequities of the past in which low-income people of color suffer the brunt of public health disasters time and again.

Right now, with tens of thousands of vacant rooms in the Bay Area, we have a chance and a duty to get it right, before it gets out of hand.

San Francisco United in Crisis is a coalition of community organizations and labor unions devoted to giving support to our most vulnerable neighbors during the COVID-19 crisis. To see the full list of medical experts who have signed this letter, please go to the coalition’s web site.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Breed: SF will extend order to stay home until at least May 1

Mayor London Breed said Monday that the shelter-in-place order that went into… Continue reading

Mental health, suicide hotlines brace for surge of crisis calls

Responders feel the weight of the coronavirus-related calls themselves

SFUSD reduces food pick-up days, sites

The district will still provide five days worth of meals for children

In a time of isolation, the demand for animal companions has increased

Flooded with requests to foster or adopt, shelters and rescue groups move operations online

Chinatown SRO tenants fear close quarters will spread coronavirus

Shared kitchens, bathrooms make it difficult to avoid contagion

Most Read