Oath of Presidential Transparency

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, have signed the Oath of Presidential Transparency. Strangely, the trio is alone among White House aspirants in doing so. Here’s the oath they signed:

“I, ________________, candidate for President of the United States, pledge to the American Public that, if elected President of the United States, my administration will be fully and robustly committedto open, transparent, and accountable government principles.

“Effective management, accountability, transparency, and disclosure of taxpayer-expended resources by federal agencies are of the utmost importance to maintain the trust of the American people. The paramount goal is effective and efficient delivery of critical government programs to the American people. Results-oriented management of federal agencies and taxpayer resources must be aggressively pursued and must provide maximum value for the public good.

“Within 30 days of accession to the Presidency, I will execute an Executive Order ensuring timely implementation of, and administrative commitment to, the letter and spirit of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006.”

Here’s why they signed the oath:

“Every American has the right to know how the government spends their tax dollars, but for too long that information has been largely hidden from public view,” Obama said. “This historic law will lift the veil of secrecy in Washington and ensure that our government is transparent and accountable to the American people.”

“Government transparency is essential to government accountability,” Brownback said. “Americans need to feel they can trust their government.”

“When government spends the people’s money, it must be done with utmost possible transparency,” declared Paul, the first to sign the oath.

There is no legitimate reason for any candidate seeking the nation’s highest office not to sign the oath. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 is better known as Coburn-Obama, the law that requires the government to establish a Google-like, searchable database of most federal spending. The purpose of the database is to put every taxpayer within a few mouse clicks of knowing how their tax dollars are being spent by Uncle Sam. The database is being created by the Office of Management and Budget and is scheduled to go live in January 2008.

An ideologically diverse coalition led by the Reason Foundation is challenging the candidates to sign the oath. Among the members of the coalition are the Reason Foundation, the Project on Government Oversight, Electronic Frontier Foundation, National Taxpayers Union, Citizens Against Government Waste and 30 others. The Examiner Newspapers, which was an outspoken advocate of Coburn-Obama, also supports the oath and wonders when the remaining presidential candidates are going to sign it. And if not, why not.

General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Gov. Newsom wants $4.2 billion to finish the Central Valley link for the bullet train, but legislators aren’t sold. (Illustration by Anne Wernikoff, CalMatters; iStock; CA High Speed Rail Authority; Shae Hammond for CalMatters)
Bullet train budget battle: Should California spend more on urban transit, not high-speed rail?

By Marissa Garcia CalMatters High-speed rail was supposed to connect California’s urban… Continue reading

Cooks work in the kitchen at The Vault Garden. (Courtesy Hardy Wilson)
Help wanted: SF restaurants are struggling to staff up

Some small businesses have to ‘sweeten the pot’ when hiring workers

Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks at Ruby Bridges Elementary School in Alameda during a March 2021 press conference. (Credit Ed Reed/EdSource)
How California plans to deter costly special education disputes

Fund is meant to help parents and schools settle differences before heading to court

Hundreds of Britney Spears fans and supporters rallied in support of ending her 13-years-long conservatorship and the removal of her father, Jamie Spears, as her conservator, at the Los Angeles County Superior Courthouse on July 14, 2021. (Photo by Ted Soqui, SIPA USA via AP Images)
The Britney effect: How California is grappling with conservatorship

By Jocelyn Wiener CalMatters However improbable, this has become the summer we… Continue reading

District Attorney Chesa Boudin is launching an investigation into whether Chinatown merchants have been targeted as victims of possibly illegitimate lawsuits. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner, 2021)
DA launches investigation of potential fraud targeting Chinatown merchants

The San Francisco District Attorney’s Office announced Wednesday it is launching an… Continue reading

Most Read