Nonindigenous plants won’t be uprooted

“Stopping San Francisco’s biggest land grab,” Sally Stephens, Dec. 4

The native plant garden and the eucalyptus forest do not need to cancel each other out. Sally Stephens, defender for the latter, and Jennifer Dever, proponent of the former, are both justified in supporting their causes.

Dever is correct in saying that in the late 19th-century eucalyptus was seen as a potentially profitable lumber source. If his 10,000 acres of western and southern San Francisco real estate didn’t sell, Adolph Sutro could always count on moving the timber that he planted on much of it. However, merchandising the trees was not the mining magnate’s primary goal. An avid amateur horticulturist — after one trip to his native Germany, he sent back 14 cases of seeds and plants — Sutro earnestly cared about trees. But he was also fully aware that real estate was a lot easier to sell when forested.

As Stephens rightly asserts, the late 19th-century inhabitants abhorred their stark, wind-roiled surrounds. The extent of the fanfare that surrounded the 1886 celebration of California’s first Arbor Day on Yerba Buena Island testifies to that. At that much-hyped event, a crowd of some 2,000 people, including Sutro, General O.O. Howard, the First Infantry Band, the Oakland Canoe Club, a doddering General Vallejo, the poet Joaquin Miller and a labor force of 700 school children, converged on the planting of pines and eucalyptus on Yerba Buena Island.

All over California, the eucalyptus — specifically, the easily grown Eucalyptus globulus — played a huge role in this 50-year forestation drive. Removing the vestiges of that landscape would be the horticultural equivalent of the architectural clearance of blocks of ornate Victorian residences when that period was out of favor, not too long ago.

There are few natural objects more beautiful than a mature California live oak, or more fragrant and attractive than a spread of russet arctostaphylos and sky blue ceanothus. As a counterpoint, the San Francisco eucalyptus forest is damp, peaceful and majestic. May California native gardens bloom on our hills, along with the turn-of-the-century forests. But not too close.

To whatever degree the Natural Areas’ agenda is adopted, The City’s scant maintenance budget should be kept in mind. Nonindigenous plants have been present in San Francisco for more than two centuries. They won’t take exclusion lying down.

Phoebe Cutler, Landscape historian

Just Posted

The Hotel Whitcomb on Market Street was one of many hotels that took in homeless people as part of The City’s shelter-in-place hotel program during the pandemic.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Closing hotels could disconnect hundreds from critical health care services

‘That baseline of humanity and dignity goes a long way’

Pachama, a Bay Area startup, is using technology to study forests and harness the carbon-consuming power of trees. (Courtesy Agustina Perretta/Pachama)
Golden Gate Park visitors may take a survey about options regarding private car access on John F. Kennedy Drive, which has been the subject of controversy during the pandemic.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Your chance to weigh in: Should JFK remain closed to cars?

Host of mobility improvements for Golden Gate Park proposed

San Francisco supervisors are considering plans to replace trash cans — a “Renaissance” garbage can is pictured on Market Street — with pricey, unnecessary upgrades. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco must end ridiculous and expensive quest for ‘pretty’ trash cans

SF’s unique and pricey garbage bins a dream of disgraced former Public Works director

Dreamforce returned to San Francisco in person this week – but with a tiny sliver of past attendance. (Courtesy Salesforce)
Dreamforce returns with hundreds on hand, down from 170,000 in the past

High hopes for a larger Salesforce conference shriveled during the summer

Most Read