No on Prop. B: San Francisco's road repair should be paid from city budget

No on Prop. B: San Francisco's road repair should be paid from city budget

The county and city of San Francisco has a $6.8 billion annual budget. But for some reason, this world-class city fails to properly maintain its streets, which are riddled with potholes, buckling sidewalks, and seismically unsafe bridges, tunnels and stairways.

San Francisco’s streets score 64 out of 100 on the pavement condition index, which correlates to the significant levels of distress that may require rehabilitation and preventive maintenance to keep them from deteriorating rapidly. The City is tied for 73rd among Bay Area cities in the condition of its streets.

The reason the streets are in such a sorry state is because city officials have spent so little to maintain them, especially in lean economic times. Consider what has happened this fiscal year — the mayor and the Board of Supervisors cut the street repair budget in half.

But rather than spend more out of the budget for street maintenance, city officials are asking residents to approve a $248 million bond measure on the November ballot. Not only is Proposition B unnecessary, it is incredibly wasteful because the interest on top of the borrowed $248 million will total $189 million, according to the budget analyst.

If the $248 million intended to be financed through a bond was instead taken out of the city budget and spread over 10 years, it would average $24.8 million annually. And the $189 million in bond interest payments would be avoided.

By placing this bond measure on the ballot, city officials are admitting they have failed in their fiscal management and need overtaxed San Franciscans to dig deeper into their pockets to bail them out. That is a tall order in this recessionary economy, especially when the bond measure requires two-thirds approval.

Instead of sticking it to the taxpayers, city officials should reorder their priorities so that they are not neglecting basics such as road repair.

The sad reality is that even if voters approve Prop. B, there will only be a negligible improvement in pothole-filled streets, because just $148.4 million of the bond is slated for street repaving. As a result, the pavement condition is expected to improve only to a score of 66 from the current 64.

To their credit, two supervisors voted against placing this measure on the ballot. Sean Elsbernd said that it’s wrong to pay for ongoing maintenance needs through debt. Mark Farrell agreed, saying, “I believe we should be paying for our street maintenance out of our annual budget.”

We hope city voters strongly reject this proposition, sending a message to city officials to get their fiscal house in order and stop neglecting road repair.

editorialselectionLocalOpinionSan Francisco

Just Posted

It’s not uncommon to find a plastic tampon applicator washed up on the beach. (Courtesy Eva Holman)
The environmental toll of disposable feminine products

Uninhibited feedback by cisgender women is key

Dreamforce returned to San Francisco in person this week – but with a tiny sliver of past attendance. PHOTO COURTESY SALESFORCE
Dreamforce returns with hundreds on hand, down from 170,000 in the past

High hopes for a larger Salesforce conference shriveled during the summer

The numbers show nearly 14 percent of San Francisco voters who participated in the Sept. 14 recall election wanted to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from elected office. (Shutterstock photo)
(Shutterstock photo)
How San Francisco neighborhoods voted in the Newsom recall

Sunset tops the list as the area with the most ‘yes’ votes

Alison Collins says that she and other members of San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education facing potential recall “represent constituents that are often erased or talked over.” <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Alison Collins speaks: Embattled SF school board member confronts the recall effort

‘It’s important for folks to know what this recall is about. It’s bigger than any one of us.’

Is the Black Cat incident a distraction from the recovery of The City’s storied nightlife industry or does Mayor London Breed’s behavior inadvertently highlight the predicament the industry’s been in since San Francisco reinstated indoor mask requirements on Aug. 20?<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner, 2021)</ins>
Club owners to maskless mayor: Are we the new fun police?

Black Cat affair highlights difficult recovery for nightlife industry

Most Read