No crime-prevention data available

We freely admit it just drives us crazy that right here in the Bay Area — where high-tech was born — the San Francisco Police Department has not maximized computer technology for crime-fighting effectiveness.

As this space repeatedly points out, New York City pioneered the street-by-street crime mapping approach back in the ’90s — a change credited with playing a large role in reducing NYC violent crimes to a fraction of what they had been.

This technique was subsequently adopted in other high-crime American cities and proven widely successful.

But the SFPD brass and city officials apparently believe that what it is currently doing is good enough — even though last year’s murder count was The City’s highest in a decade.

San Francisco’s latest bad example of police obstructionism to change is revealed in an independent consulting firm’s evaluation of the first year of a foot-patrol pilot program approved by the Board of Supervisors in 2006.

Mayor Gavin Newsom, police Chief Heather Fong and the Police Officers Association all opposed the foot beats, arguing that only top police officials should decide officer deployment.

The research report did credit the SFPD for actually complying with the supervisors’ demand to assign a required number of officers to walk the beat.

Beginning in January 2007, a minimum of 20 officers in the eight highest-crime districts were required to walk foot beats within a 24-hour period.

Accordingly, there was an 86 percent increase in foot patrols from 2006 to 2007. Man-hours on the foot patrols doubled from approximately 45,000 to 83,000 during the first six months of 2007, present on the streets for an average of 20 hours daily.

More than three-quarters of the San Franciscans surveyed for the report said they felt safer since police foot patrols were implemented.

More than 2,000 city residents were asked if officers walking a beat made them feel safer; and 82 percent polled by phone and 73 percent responding to the written survey said “yes.” The majority of police officers surveyed also liked the program.

So far, all this is to the good.

But the researchers did uncover one major problem: The Police Department did not bother collecting specific crime statistics that could determine whether the foot patrols actually reduced crime.

The report blasted the SFPD for “antiquated and inefficient technology” and “lack of administrative oversight.”

This startling failure is not about spending millions of dollars for new computers and software.

It is about The City’s police administration finally accepting the necessity to collect meaningful performance measures and accountability controls, and then acting rapidly to shift manpower where it is most needed.

San Francisco needs a police establishment that no longer resists the 21st century.

Just Posted

ose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014. 
Rose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014.
Willie and Rose: An alliance for the ages

How the Mayor and Chinatown activist shaped San Francisco, then and now

San Francisco supervisors are considering plans to replace trash cans — a “Renaissance” garbage can is pictured on Market Street — with pricey, unnecessary upgrades. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco must end ridiculous and expensive quest for ‘pretty’ trash cans

SF’s unique and pricey garbage bins a dream of disgraced former Public Works director

Giants right fielder Mike Yastrzemski is pictured at bat on July 29 against the Dodgers at Oracle Park; the teams are in the top spots in their league as the season closes. (Chris Victorio/Special to The Examiner)
With playoff positions on the line, old rivalries get new life

Giants cruised through season, Dodgers not far behind

Golden Gate Park visitors may take a survey about options regarding private car access on John F. Kennedy Drive, which has been the subject of controversy during the pandemic.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Your chance to weigh in: Should JFK remain closed to cars?

Host of mobility improvements for Golden Gate Park proposed

Drivers gathered to urge voters to reject an initiative that would exempt Uber, Lyft, and other gig economy companies from state labor laws, in San Francisco in October 2020. (Jim Wilson/New York Times)
What’s the role of unions in the 21st century?

As membership declines in California, economic inequality increases

Most Read