New rules in fiscal tug of war

Get ready for the 2008 round of California’s state/local tug of war over scarce budget dollars. A predictably acrimonious outbreak occurs every time the state must cope with an especially large deficit — such as this year’s $14.5 billion shortfall with its proposed 10 percent across-the-board cuts and early release of more than 22,000 prisoners.

In the three decades since unintended consequences of Proposition 13 shifted much of the counties’ prior tax collection and disbursing power to state government, much of the thrust of California fiscal legislation has been to empower Sacramento to withhold, postpone or cancel various mandated or negotiated fund transfers directed for local jurisdictions.

For state officials, this was a relatively easy quick fix for immediate monetary needs, sparing any need to face the more painful tasks of cutting services or raising taxes. Generally the shortchanged counties, cities, school boards and special districts would be issued the equivalent of Sacramento IOUs. And these often as not were paid off only after prolonged public pressure from those interest groups being shortchanged.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is now calling for 10 percent cuts across every California state department. This opens substantial space for reduced local disbursements that would lead to difficult cutbacks in county, municipal and school services at their exact time of greater demand. For example, if statewide Medi-Cal is cut $1 billion as the governor recommends, San Francisco stands to lose $5 million and San Mateo County would be forced to curtail its methadone treatment program — which had just begun recovering from years of rate freezes — according to respective county health departments.

Lack of early intervention services would then inexorably put more patients into county-funded emergency rooms for more expensive treatments. In the same way, saving the state $400 million by early release of 22,000 prison inmates and halting direct supervision of 18,500 parolees could be expected to put some recidivists back into overcrowded county jails.

Despite such risks — and existing delays of an estimated $1.27 billion in human services payments owed to counties, which the California State Association of Counties has already expressed its concerns about — new rules limit the extent to which the Legislature can withhold future local funds. California’s budget balancing struggle will be the first trial of Proposition 1A, passed in 2004 with bipartisan legislative support and Schwarzenegger’s endorsement. Now the state can only borrow local revenues during fiscal emergencies with a two-thirds vote of the Legislature and the governor’s signature. Such borrowing can only take place twice during 10 years and only after the prior loan is repaid.

Additionally, the state is now required to either pay or suspend most required programs and can approve county requests to trade property taxes for sales taxes. These changes guarantee more stabilized funding for county services and should create less room for rancor.

Perhaps even better, with state government now considerably more restricted in how it can manipulate local revenues, powerful additional pressures are generated for true reform of California’s finances instead of the continued quick fixes.

General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Anti-eviction demonstrators rally outside San Francisco Superior Court. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Report: Unpaid rent due to COVID-19 could be up to $32.7M per month

A new city report that attempts to quantify how much rent has… Continue reading

Music venues around The City have largely been unable to reopen due to ongoing pandemic health orders. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF to cut $2.5M in fees to help 300 nightlife venues

San Francisco will cut $2.5 million in fees for hundreds of entertainment… Continue reading

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett departs the U.S. Capitol on October 21, 2020 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump nominated Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg after Ginsburg’s death. (Photo by Stefani Reynolds/Getty Images)
GOP senators confirm Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court in partisan vote

By Jennifer Haberkorn Los Angeles Times The Senate on Monday confirmed Judge… Continue reading

Curator Tim Burgard looks over a section of the galleries comprising “The de Young Open,” a huge, varied collection of work by Bay Area artists. (Photo courtesy Gary Sexton/Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco)
Bay Area artists jam-pack vivid ‘de Young Open’

Huge exhibition — with works for sale — showcases diversity, supports community

SF Board of Education vice president Gabriela Lopez and commissioner Alison Collins listen at a news conference condemning recent racist and social media attacks targeted at them and the two student representatives on Monday, Oct. 26, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Online attacks on school board members denounced by city officials

City officials on Monday condemned the targeting of school board members, both… Continue reading

Most Read