(Rachael Garner/Special to S.F. Examiner)

(Rachael Garner/Special to S.F. Examiner)

New, costly ‘Peskin Commission’ is not the answer to the housing crisis

San Francisco is in the middle of a severe housing crisis. More and more San Franciscans can’t afford housing, and the current supply of affordable housing can’t meet the growing demand.

Our elected leaders should address the root causes of the problem by promoting common-sense policies, including adding to the housing supply and cutting the bureaucracy that makes housing more costly.

That’s what I am trying to do with my housing policies. As Budget Chair, I’ve made record-setting investments in affordable housing, year after year. And I just ushered through a new bill that will increase the supply of affordable housing by building thousands of new rent-controlled in-law units.

I don’t have all the answers, but I am working on real, common-sense solutions that address the crisis. Unfortunately, there is little common sense to be found in a ballot initiative written by my colleague, Supervisor Aaron Peskin.

Peskin’s measure would create a new “Peskin Commission” to micromanage two little-known, hard-working city departments — the Mayor’s Office of Housing and the Office of Economic and Workforce Development — that are focused on expanding the supply of affordable housing.

That’s right: Peskin’s solution to the housing crisis is to create a new, expensive layer of bureaucracy instead of further expanding the supply of affordable housing.

Why? Unfortunately, the answer is driven by inside-baseball politics rather than sound policy.

Peskin is upset about a ballot measure that requires competitive bidding for new affordable housing. It’s polling very well because it ensures a fair process and keeps housing costs lower.

Peskin doesn’t like the measure because it seeks to add competition where there currently is none. Under Peskin’s rival measure, the Peskin Commission would have the bureaucratic power to thwart the aims of the proposed competitive-bidding law.

So it’s clear that the creation of the Peskin Commission is motivated by petty politics. But inside baseball aside, why is it bad policy? There are three main reasons:

First, it’s expensive. The City Controller found that the Peskin Commission would come at a great cost. We’re talking about millions of dollars — and the taxpayers will be left holding the bag.

Second, it will slow down construction. Housing policy experts believe the Peskin Commission will unnecessarily delay the production of new affordable housing.

Third, it will drive up home prices. The experts believe that the Peskin Commission will further add to the cost of developing housing, and thus, higher and higher housing prices will result.

What we need is more affordable housing, built quickly, while avoiding unnecessary expense to the taxpayers. The Peskin Commission will do the opposite: It will drive up housing prices, slow down construction and cost the taxpayers millions of dollars.

Instead of putting up roadblocks to new affordable housing, we should be building bridges. More red tape is not the answer. More affordable housing is. That’s why I urge you to join leaders in labor and business in opposing the Peskin Commission.

Mark Farrell represents District 2 on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.Aaron PeskinBoard of SupervisorshouwingMark FarrellSan Francisco

Just Posted

Passengers board a BART train at Powell Street station on Friday, Oct. 23, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Powell Station death serves as a grim reminder. BART doors don’t stop for anyone

What you need to know about safety sensors on the trains

If he secured a full term in the Senate, Newsom would become the most powerful Californian Democrat since Phil Burton at the height of his career, or maybe ever. <ins>(Kevin Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
The 49ers unloaded three first-rounders to draft Trey Lance from North Dakota State, who played one football game in 2020. (Courtesy of the San Francisco 49ers)
Week 2 of the NFL Season: Highlights and lowlights from around the league

By Tyler Dunne New York Times There were no shirtless pictures of… Continue reading

About to turn 100, Black ranger Betty Reid Soskin (pictured in Wildcat Canyon Regional Park near her home in Richmond in August) has fought to ensure that American history includes the stories that get overlooked. (Chanell Stone/New York Times)
‘America’s oldest park ranger’ is only her latest chapter

Betty Reid Soskin is also a mother, activist, musician, business owner, political aide, blogger

Firefighters extinguish burning material near Lake Tahoe on Sept. 3 in the wake of the Caldor Fire; environmental scientists say the huge fire is bringing to light deficiencies in forest management. <ins>(Max Whittaker/New York Times)</ins>
Cal Fire, timber industry must face an inconvenient truth

We are logging further into the wildfire and climate crisis

Most Read