Many great reasons to kill death penalty

I am writing to encourage voters to vote for Proposition 34, which will remove the death penalty from the state Constitution and substitute a penalty of life without the possibility of parole, for several reasons.

First, eliminating the death penalty will make it impossible to make a mistake and execute an innocent person, a grisly prospect that a humane society cannot allow to happen.

Second, the death penalty has never been shown to deter anyone from killing, and murder rates are high in spite of death penalty laws. And it is almost never used, with only 13 executions in California in 34 years despite more than 700 on death row. The appeal process can take 25 years or more, so most people convicted die in prison rather than being executed; it just doesn’t work.

Third, it just costs too much money, wasting $130 million a year on maintaining death row and in the appeal process. This money is much more desperately needed for education, social services and public transit.

And lastly, of course, it is an immoral law, because if killing is wrong then the state shouldn’t kill either. For the state to kill just teaches people that killing is OK.

Specific penalties should not be written into the state Constitution anyway, because customs and mores change and evolve and progress. Please vote yes on Proposition 34.

Miriam Berg
Berkeley

Our parks are not for sale

Perhaps The San Francisco Examiner has not read or heard what bond opponents have explained in ballot arguments and many neighborhood meetings (“Parks bond faces powerful foes,” Sunday).

This bond would put the Recreation and Park Department in charge of $161 million — much of it fungible — borrowed from taxpayers, with no restrictions on this wayward department’s current money-driven, fiscally irresponsible, privatization policy.

Rec and Park is now managing our parks and facilities as real estate from which to extract financial value. It is turning our green spaces into venues for private events. It is limiting public access by imposing and sharply raising fees, renting or leasing spaces and facilities to private entities, and turning management duties over to private contractors. That is the problem. We cannot afford to feed this policy.

The wrong tax is on the ballot. Proposition B can only be used to fund capital projects, therefore it would not help meet parks’ most dire needs for maintenance and staff.

We who have joined across the political spectrum to oppose this bond are a canary in the coal mine. Warning: Rec and Park is quietly converting itself into a pay-to-play enterprise, and public access is gradually being limited and our parks gradually privatized.

Denis Mosgofian
www.takebackourparks.org
San Francisco

Condo project bad for S.F.

I oppose the 8 Washington St. project. This is in violation of the height limit to allow all San Franciscans access and views of the Bay.

It would be a trade-off of quality of life for most of the people of San Francisco so that the rich and the politicians who are in their thrall can benefit. At a recent Board of Supervisors hearing, I heard an architect support the project “because having a condo there would be a convenience for people from Orinda and Moraga.” These condos will be sold for upward of $10 million!  

We need more affordable housing for San Francisco residents, not a pied-à-terre for rich people who live outside The City.  

Loretta Chardin
San Francisco

death penaltyDeath rowletters to the editorOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

A warning notice sits under the windshield wiper of a recreational vehicle belonging to a homeless man named David as it sits parked on De Wolf Street near Alemany Boulevard on Friday, Aug. 31, 2018. A proposed SF Municipal Transportation Agency law would make it illegal for overnight parking on the side street for vehicles taller than seven feet or longer than 22 feet. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Fight over ‘poverty tows’ heats up

‘What can we do to ensure the vehicle stays in the hands of the owner?’

Crab fisherman Skip Ward of Marysville casts his crab net out off a pier near Fort Point. (Craig Lee/Special to The	Examiner)
San Francisco came back to life, and we captured it all

Last spring, in the early days of the pandemic, the bestselling authors… Continue reading

Revelers at Madrone Art Bar in the early hours of June 15, 2021 (Courtesy Power Quevedo).
No social distancing at Motown-themed dance party

‘I don’t care how anyone feels, I just want to dance!’

Azikiwee Anderson of Rize Up Bakery pulls and twists sourdough into shape on Wednesday, June 2, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco’s Rize Up Bakery serving up sourdough with a call to action

Azikiwee Anderson wakes up most mornings just before dawn to start cooking… Continue reading

<em>The San Francisco Peace Pagoda stands tall in between Japan Center East and West malls.</em>
 (Ida Mojadad/The Examiner)
Patrons return to the Japantown mall

‘We’re so happy—it’s really hard to make a profit’

Most Read