Letter: Half the poison is still poison. Fight the 3 a.m. bar bill.

In the reckless rush to extend the hours in which California bars serve alcohol, lawmakers are offering the residents a cup of poison. In the face of outcry from both health and safety advocates and the public at large, these legislators have poured out half that cup. Their hope is that we will somehow ignore the fact that half a cup of poison is still poison.

SB 58, the legislation that would extend bar hours in most of the major population centers of the state, has been amended so that last call would only go to 3 a.m. instead of 4 a.m. No matter what the closing time, the bill is intended to facilitate more alcohol sales. Already California bears a heavy burden from overconsumption. Each year, alcohol kills over 10,000 residents and costs the state $35 billion. A recent analysis from the nonprofit Alcohol Research Group showed that 4 a.m. last calls would cost Los Angeles alone anywhere from $266 million to $1 billion over 5 years, and result in over 3,000 additional DUIs. A 3 a.m. last call might make those numbers smaller, but the total costs in money and human suffering remain staggering. The 3 a.m. last call is a promise only to make things somewhat worse, instead of much worse. This is a clear and fundamental failure of leadership.

This failure is inherent to the bill. Its lead author, State Senator Scott Wiener, has repeatedly stressed how important he feels nightlife is. In light of the passion he espouses, it is disheartening that he cannot propose any ways to improve it besides selling more alcohol—the primary source of harm in the late-night economy. In fact, the 3 a.m. last call raises questions as to whether this bill serves “nightlife” at all. The Los Angeles city council’s recent decision to oppose the bill shows resistance to late last calls emerging on the city level. Both the political fight and licensing and insurance fees necessary to extend bar hours threaten to make late last calls available to only the wealthiest of nightclubs and hotels. These operations make for great campaign donors, but is that worth the bitter brew that California will be forced to swallow?

Carson Benowitz-Fredericks, Research Manager, Alcohol Justice


If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Study: Banning cars on Market had minimal effect on side streets

A traffic nightmare. Congestions madness. Carmageddon. Those were the fears voiced by… Continue reading

Police Commission president calls for probe into allegations of ‘rampant’ anti-black bias in SFPD

A newly surfaced email alleging widespread anti-black bias in San Francisco’s police… Continue reading

Breed declares local emergency to counter threat of coronavirus

City officials warn against discrimination while they prepare for the possibility of an outbreak.

Educators warn of possible strike after district calls for budget cuts, layoffs

SFUSD faces up to $31.8 million shortfall in current school year

Sting builds tuneful ‘Last Ship’

Vivid score, great singers buoy pop star’s musical

Most Read