Judge puts pressure on SFUSD to finish disability access work

A federal judge has indicated she will not grant the San Francisco Unified School District an extension to finish the first round of disability access improvements required under a 2004 legal settlement.

Known as the Lopez case, the district settled the class-action lawsuit by agreeing to a rigid timeline to modernize nearly 100 of its facilities to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The deadline for the first group of 30 schools is June 30, 2007. District facilities officials, hired after the settlement, told The Examiner in September that they knew the deadline was unrealistic because it assumed that all projects would begin simultaneously. A more manageable schedule that staggered the construction work was established. The work has stayed on schedule and on budget, and work on 21 of the schools will be completed by June 2007, according to district officials.

The district’s general counsel, David Campos, said that although an official ruling has not been released, Judge Susan Illston told lawyers at a hearing Friday that she was leaning against granting the district’s request to extend the timeline for nine schools not near completion.

“I was actually very surprised. It didn’t even occur to me the judge would not grant the extension,” said David Goldin, the district’s chief facilities officer. “I thought it was very reasonable.”

Goldin said he didn’t know if the work could be accelerated at the nine remaining schools in time to meet the June deadline.

“I’m hesitant to suggest it’s even possible,” Goldin said. “It would take a significant shift of strategy that would be so dramatic and so phenomenally expensive to accelerate these projects by two years.”

If the judge is impatient with the San Francisco Unified School District, it is because problems with the SFUSD’s previous facilities officers — which included mismanagement, corruption and even fraud — resulted in the required disabilities improvements being neglected, school officials say.

School officials have expressed concern that if the district does not pass a $450 million facilities bond in November to fund disability improvements on an additional 64 schools, a federal monitor could be appointed who might require the district to sell school property or take money from the general budget.

beslinger@examiner.comGeneral OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Dr. Grant Colfax, director of the San Francisco Department of Public Health. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF moves into purple tier, triggering curfew and business shutdowns

San Francisco moved into the state’s purple COVID-19 tier Saturday, requiring The… Continue reading

San Francisco lacks housing data that would let it track rental vacancies and prices. New legislation is seeking to change that.<ins> (Photo by Joel Angel Jurez/2016 Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Landlords blast proposal to require annual report on rentals as invasion of privacy

Housing inventory could give city better data on housing vacancies, affordability

University of San Francisco head coach Todd Golden coaches his team on defense during a 2019 gameat War Memorial Gymnasium on the campus of the University of San Francisco. (Ryan Gorcey / S.F. Examiner)
Stunner in Bubbleville: USF upsets fourth-ranked Virginia

Less than 48 hours removed from a loss to a feeble UMass… Continue reading

Health care workers would be the first group in the state to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. (Go Nakamura/Getty Images/TNS)
Hope on the way: Here’s what to know about California’s COVID-19 vaccine plan

The first batch of doses could hit the state as soon as early December

The Big Game was played Friday at Memorial Stadium in Berkeley. (Shutterstock)
Stanford blocks extra point to stun Cal, win 123rd Big Game 24-23

The 123rd edition of the Big Game featured a number of firsts.… Continue reading

Most Read