Is money from redevelopments a valuable tool or a slush fund?

California’s dismal economy and deficit-ridden state and local budgets created a yeasty political climate for efforts to undermine state redevelopment laws and thus gain access to multibillion-dollar pots of money this year.

Local governments, cities mostly, can create redevelopment projects in urban areas plagued by blight, pump money into upgrading public facilities and underwriting private development, and then retain increases in tax revenue stemming from the new construction.

Cities became very creative in defining blight and using redevelopment funds to subsidize auto malls, shopping centers and other generators of sales and property taxes, and diverting billions of dollars from schools, counties and other local governments — eventually $5 billion-plus a year.

Legislative reforms to curb redevelopment abuses were enacted in the 1990s. Ever since, local agencies have been trying to chip away at restrictions on defining blight and using redevelopment funds to subsidize development in unblighted areas.

Several bills that would, in one way or another, soften state redevelopment restrictions were introduced during the just-concluded legislative session, including one that would have almost completely removed the shackles on declaring blight.

One measure, carried for the city of Downey, would have flatly declared an unblighted area as blighted so the city could subsidize a proposed electric car factory. It died only because Tesla Motors decided to put its new factory in the Bay Area.

Nevertheless, the Legislature passed another bill that would, in effect, do the same favor for some communities near the former Fort Ord Army base, allowing them to ignore current redevelopment law that bans subsidies to commercial development on unblighted land to help a big new shopping center become reality. Assembly Bill 1791 by Assemblyman William Monning, D-Carmel, could have insidious, long-term effects by setting a precedent for ignoring redevelopment reforms that other communities would be certain to emulate.

The other two bills reaching Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s desk are less bothersome. Both were sponsored by the city of Los Angeles and would mildly expand the purposes of redevelopment to include rehabilitation of low-income public housing and creating small-business incubators.

Some ambitious communities want to go even further, seeking authority to funnel redevelopment funds into paying for police patrols or, as in the case of one bill that died this year, using redevelopment dollars to assist distressed homeowners.

Properly used, redevelopment can be a valuable tool for community improvement. Improperly used, it can become a political slush fund. And, that’s why maintaining the tight reform standards is important.

Dan Walters’ Sacramento Bee columns are syndicated by the Scripps Howard News Service.

billsOp Edsop-edOpinionslush fund

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Azikiwee Anderson of Rize Up Bakery pulls and twists sourdough into shape on Wednesday, June 2, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco’s Rize Up Bakery serving up sourdough with a call to action

Azikiwee Anderson wakes up most mornings just before dawn to start cooking… Continue reading

Although The City has been shut down and largely empty, people have enjoyed gathering in places such as Dolores Park. <ins>(Al Saracevic/The Examiner)</ins>
Come back to San Francisco: The City needs you now

Time to get out of the house, people. The City’s been lonely… Continue reading

A surveillance camera outside Macy’s at Union Square on Tuesday, July 28, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Is the tide turning against surveillance cameras in SF?

Crime-fighting camera networks are springing up in commercial areas all around San… Continue reading

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott speaks alongside Mayor London Breed at a news conference about 2019 crime statistics at SFPD headquarters on Jan. 21, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What the media gets wrong about crime in San Francisco

By Lincoln Mitchell Special to The Examiner Seemingly every day now, you… Continue reading

Vice President Kamala Harris is under fire for her comments in Guatemala earlier this week. (Examiner file photo.)
SF immigration advocates slam Kamala Harris’ ‘betrayal’ to her past

Kamala Harris’ comments earlier this week discouraging Central Americans from traveling to… Continue reading

Most Read