Iran’s phony offer of disarmament talks

In a new package of proposals released last week to the major powers, Iran expressed a willingness to discuss global nuclear disarmament. Unsurprisingly, nowhere did Iran mention its own nuclear program, which authorities implausibly insist is for civil energy. Despite this, the Obama administration is eager to embark on negotiations without preconditions. The only way to justify this enthusiasm is to recognize that the White House cares more about gestures than actual results.

Take, for instance, Thursday’s interview in the Washington Post with Iranian ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency Ali Asghar Soltanieh, who rebuffed American efforts to punish Iran’s insistence on nuclear proliferation: “Not only did we not give up, but we increased our efforts and made more and more achievements. We passed all these barriers, one by one.” Does this sound like a country eager to engage in disarmament? He continued to assert that Iran forbids weapons of mass destruction on religious grounds. How then does Iran justify ruthlessly beating pro-Democratic protesters?

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told journalists aboard Air Force One on Saturday: “We’re not talking for talking’s sake. This may not be a topic they wanted to be brought up, but I can assure you that it’s a topic that we’ll bring up … The Iranians have responsibilities … to walk away from their ballistic nuclear weapons program … That’s our goal.” But simply raising a topic that the Iranians dislike is setting the bar rather low.

As Emily Landau, director of the arms control and regional security project at the Institute for National Security Studies, notes, every negotiation that has followed this pattern has resulted in failure. This is just “a further step in Iran’s overall strategy of stalling — injecting just enough cooperation at strategic junctures in order to ward off the harshest measures.” This meshes nicely with what former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton described as the administration’s desire to negotiate for negotiation’s sake.

This is the very ticking time bomb scenario politicians have debated for years. The administration has set a deadline for Iran to suspend its nuclear activities by the end of 2009. If the president is serious about getting results, maybe it’s time to raise the stakes and start setting preconditions.

Just Posted

SF may ask voters to approve a vacant storefront tax in March

Supervisor Peskin says proposal to give small businesses ‘leverage in lease negotiations’

Chesa Boudin to be sworn in as San Francisco DA in January

District Attorney-elect Chesa Boudin will not take office until early next year… Continue reading

After high-profile dismissals, Breed appoints new SFMTA director

Jeffrey Tumlin to lead Muni after sexual harassment scandal, operator shortage

US diplomats describe Trump’s effort to hijack Ukraine policy for his political benefit

Historic public impeachment proceedings got underway Wednesday

Most Read