In guns vs. butter, butter is winning the challenge

H. Rowan Gaither Jr. advised the great men of his era. He helped found RAND, the original U.S. think tank. He headed the Ford Foundation and served on numerous presidential committees. Ultimately, President Dwight Eisenhower would tab him to chair an independent assessment of America’s national security needs.

For once, Ike got more than he asked for.

The Gaither report argued for an astronomical increase in defense spending to fight the Cold War. As if to underscore its recommendations, the Soviets launched Sputnik just weeks before Gaither delivered his report to the Oval Office.

After watching the Soviets win the “space race,” many Americans believed Moscow’s military power might soon overtake that of the United States.

Gaither’s report galvanized calls for checkbook warfare.

But Ike balked. “You can’t win a war by bankrupting yourself,” he said. Eisenhower understood that the art of great power strategy required balancing economic vitality with sound security.

Today’s White House would have Americans believe they are upholding Ike’s legacy. They are not.

This administration presents cuts in missile defense as providing “cost-effective and proven missile defense,” rather than calling them what they are: cuts. When it pulls back on commitments in Afghanistan, White House officials say they’re simply ensuring that we are “pursuing the right strategy,” rather than admit that they’re setting the stage for a cut-and-run. When they cancel the purchase of F-22 fighter aircraft, they claim they’re “not buying outdated Cold War weapons.” In reality, they’re just not buying the planes we need.

White House plans for the Pentagon seem driven not by the desire to spend smartly, but by the imperative to just spend less on defense — even though they seem quite content to spend hundreds of billions of dollars we don’t have on all kinds of “stimulus” projects like accordion festivals in San Antonio. So much for priorities.

The justification offered for cutting corners on defense is that we face tough economic times. Tough choices have to be made. But the White House is making all the wrong tough calls.

Cutting defense won’t keep Washington, D.C., from bankrupting the nation. The savage truth is that defense spending is far — very far — down the list of government spending priorities.

When Ike was in the White House, military spending was 50 percent of the federal budget. (No wonder he was reluctant to spend more.) Today, defense spending is less than one-fifth of the federal budget, and it’s going down.

National defense now ranks fourth in overall government spending priorities, falling behind the combined cost of Social Security and Medicare, public education and means-tested welfare aid. A recent report by Robert Rector of The Heritage Foundation shows how welfare spending has leapfrogged the Pentagon’s budget. In 10 years, he said, our state and federal governments will shell out $10.3 trillion on welfare programs (and that’s not counting the trillion-dollar-plus increase in federal health spending proposed in Congress).

Thirty-plus years into the war on poverty, some 40 million Americans are still mired in poverty. The Great Society model is obviously not getting the job done. The war on poverty has become a spending quagmire. Indeed, the White House calls for spending more on welfare in one year than President George W. Bush spent on the entire Iraq war.

The preamble of the Constitution stipulates that the federal government must provide for the common defense for a reason: It is job No. 1 for Washington, D.C.

Ike was right in asserting that sound fiscal policies are part of providing national security. But taking shortcuts on defense is not the answer. And pouring ever-increasing sums of money into ineffective public programs is not the greater good. Expanding domestic programs that consume the nation’s wealth at an unsustainable pace neither grows the economy nor keeps the homeland safe.

James Jay Carafano is a senior research fellow for national security at The Heritage Foundation (www.heritage.org).

Op Edsop-edOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The City has struggled to conduct outreach in some neighborhoods as it works to expand Slow Streets — such as this section of Page Street in the Lower Haight — to underserved neighborhoods. <ins>(Jordi Molina/Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
SFMTA delays vote on Bayview Slow Streets, approves five others in ‘underserved’ areas

SFMTA struggles to conduct outreach in neighborhoods with lower internet access

Stern Grove Festival organizers are planning to bring back the popular summer concert series — The Isley Brothers show in 2019 is pictured — with limited audience capacity. (Ming Vong/S.F. Examiner)
Indoor shows won’t be flooding SF stages soon but Stern Grove might be back in June

While San Francisco Mayor London Breed announced that live performances may resume… Continue reading

San Francisco Giants pitcher Johnny Cueto  (47) started on Opening Day against the Colorado Rockies at Oracle Park on April 9, 2021. (Photography by Chris Victorio | Special to the S.F. Examiner).
Giants welcome fans back with strong performance by Cueto

By Ethan Kassel Special to S.F. Examiner ORACLE PARK — The first… Continue reading

James Harbor appears in court after he was arrested on charges in the July 4th shooting death of 6-year-old Jace Young on Friday, Jan. 8, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Murder case heads to trial over killing of 6-year-old Jace Young

Hearing reveals new details in ‘horrific’ Fourth of July shooting

BART passengers may see more frequent service by this fall. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
BART service increases possible as soon as September

Proposal would double weekday, daytime trains and extend system operating hours

Most Read