Rendering of 2000 Bryant St. (Courtesy BDE Architecture)

Rendering of 2000 Bryant St. (Courtesy BDE Architecture)

Ideological purity or affordable housing on Bryant Street?

An important housing proposal in the Mission District is seeking its permit approval from the Planning Commission this Thursday. Its official name is 2000-2070 Bryant Street, but in the Mission’s polarized climate, it’s ominously called the “Beast on Bryant,” presumably because of its supposed emphasis on market-rate housing. But in spite of being demonized, the project sponsor responded to community’s concerns and this “beast” has been transformed: It now includes an unusually high amount of affordable housing, too.

This is a neighborhood that really needs more affordable housing, especially if it is permanently affordable to low-income residents. Specifically, the Bryant Street project proposes two buildings: one market-rate with 199 apartments, and one affordable with 139 apartments. Doing the math, that means that 41 percent of the project’s homes would be below-market rate, a remarkably high proportion for a project this small. It achieved this through a rarely used tool, called a land dedication.

The project sponsor essentially gifted 36 percent of his land to the Mayor’s Office of Housing for construction of affordable housing. That is no small thing for a chronically underfunded city agency that is rarely able to acquire land in a super-expensive real estate market like ours.

In a city that’s grappling with an unprecedented housing affordability and displacement crisis, it’s strange how little consensus exists on what to do.

The nonprofit San Francisco Housing Action Coalition believes increasing production of housing at all income levels is the basic starting point. Our city is growing by about 10,000 new residents annually, but it only builds a small fraction of its needed housing. This is a primary cause of displacement. While it’s vital to figure out ways to stabilize neighborhoods and keep residents in their homes, if we don’t build more housing faster, displacement of San Francisco’s renters will continue unabated.  

On the flip side of the argument are those who believe that construction of any market-rate housing in the Mission is wrong and must be stopped. They will be out in force on Thursday asking the commission to reject 2000-2070 Bryant Street.

This is a puzzling response to the stark housing challenges we face, one where ideological purity appears to trump pragmatic solutions. The opponents dogmatically insist that it is better to reject 139 permanently affordable homes for the Mission than allow a single market-rate home to be built. A crucial bit of information is that the 139 affordable homes in the Bryant Street project alone exceeds the 136 units that were built under The City’s inclusionary housing policy in all of the Mission in the 14 years from 2000 to 2013, according to UC Berkeley’s Center for Community Innovation’s Mission District Case Study in July 2015.

It’s not clear whom the project’s opponents speak for in their rejection of the land dedication offered by this project.  Their insistence that only a 100 percent affordable housing development is acceptable seems strangely at odds with the realities of a market economy. The City, by itself, lacks the funding to buy land and build affordable housing. Free land is being offered for that purpose. Is this not a win-win for The City and 139 future low-income families? Or is the principle itself more important than the housing?

Tim Colen is the executive director of the San Francisco Housing Action Coalition.affordable housingBeast on Bryantbelow market rateBryant StreetdevelopmentSan FranciscoTim Colen

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco Police officers speak with people while responding to a call outside a market on Leavenworth Street in the Tenderloin on Tuesday, June 22, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
SFPD makes the case for more officers, citing Walgreens video

Most of us have seen the video. It shows a man filling… Continue reading

A 14-Mission Muni bus heads down Mission Street near Yerba Buena Gardens. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Pandemic experiments morph into long-term solutions for SF transit agency

The streets of San Francisco became real-time laboratories for The City’s public… Continue reading

NO CONNECTION TO SERVER:
Unable to connect to GPS server ‘blackpress.newsengin.com’
Debate reignites over San Francisco’s first public bank

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, momentum was building for San Francisco to… Continue reading

Apprenticeship instructor Mike Miller, center, demonstrates how to set up a theodolite, a hyper-sensitive angle measuring device, for apprentices Daniel Rivas, left, Ivan Aguilar, right, and Quetzalcoatl Orta, far right, at the Ironworkers Local Union 377 training center in Benicia on June 10, 2021. (Courtesy Anne Wernikoff/CalMatters)
California’s affordable housing crisis: Are labor union requirements in the way?

By Manuela Tobias CalMatters California lawmakers introduced several bills this year that… Continue reading

Mayor London Breed spoke at the reopening of the San Francisco Public Library main branch on April 20. (Sebastian Miño-Bucheli/Special to The Examiner)
SF reopening more libraries through the summer

After a handful of San Francisco public libraries reopened last month for… Continue reading

Most Read