Hunters Point housing showdown

Supervisor Chris Daly portrays himself as The City’s most aggressive fighter for affordable housing. His track record includes attempts to push the Board of Supervisors into making massive budgetary set-asides for more housing, and playing hardball with large-scale housing developers to pressure for maximum concessions.

One Daly strategy has been to threaten builders with proposed ballot measures that could make deal-breaking demands. He did help finalize the expansion of Trinity Plaza on central Market Street after that deal almost broke down in 2004 when other supervisors sought more last-minute conditions. Then in 2005, he negotiated a record-setting $55 million in community impact fees — largely going to neighborhood nonprofits — from the developers of Rincon Hill’s five SoMa residential towers, after threatening to put the development on the ballot.

Now the supervisor has embarked on his most controversial move ever. He is spearheading a ballot initiative to require that at least half of all housing built in the planned 10,000-unit Hunters Point-Candlestick Point development must be affordable to San Franciscans with household incomes between 30 percent and 80 percent of the county median.

On Monday, Daly and a group of community activists submitted what they said were one-third more signatures than the 7,168 required to qualify the measure for the ballot. The Department of Elections has 30 days to rule on the petition signatures’ validity. Daly first tried to place his measure on the ballot with four signatures from Board of Supervisors members, but was unable to gain the needed support.

The director of the Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development, Michael Cohen, promptly warned that even a “cursory review” would prove that a 50 percent affordability mandate “will render the project completely infeasible” and “kill what could be one of the most important projects in The City’s history.”

Project developer Lennar Corp. has already agreed that 25 percent of the 8,000 to 10,000 housing units would be priced below market rates. The massive development is also to include 350 acres of open space, a “clean tech” business campus — and a new football stadium if the 49ers ultimately do not relocate to Santa Clara.

Supervisor Daly should not be playing Russian roulette with much-needed housing and park space in the too-long-neglected southeastern corner of The City. A new major project with 25 percent of the housing units genuinely priced below market rates would already be a historical precedent for San Francisco.

Yes, it is possible that a tough political stance on conversion of the vacated Hunters Point Naval Shipyard might wring a few more concessions out of Lennar. But it might also rob the community of important potential benefits by making the developers walk away. Certainly the emerging impasse will hardly entice other top developers to attempt rebuilding other neglected areas of The City.

General OpinionOpinion

Just Posted

Pharmacist Hank Chen is known for providing personalized service at Charlie’s Pharmacy in the Fillmore.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Left: A Walgreens at 300 Gough St. is among San Francisco stores closing.
Walgreens closures open the door for San Francisco’s neighborhood pharmacies

‘I think you’ll see more independents start to pop up’

San Franciscans are likely to have the opportunity to vote in four different elections in 2022. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Electionpalooza: SF school board recall will kick off a flurry of local races

‘It’s going to be a lot of elections and a lot of decisions for voters to make’

Four young politicos were elected to city government on the Peninsula in 2020. From left: Redwood City Councilmember Michael Smith; South San Francisco Councilmember James Coleman; Redwood City Councilmember Lissette Espinoza-Garnica; and East Palo Alto Councilmember Antonio Lopez.<ins> (Examiner illustration/Courtesy photos)</ins>
Progressive politicians rise to power on the Peninsula. Will redistricting reverse the trend?

‘There’s this wave of young people really trying to shake things up’

The fate of San Francisco nicotine giant Juul remains to be seen, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is reviewing whether to allow certain flavored vape products on the market. <ins>(Jeenah Moon/New York Times)</ins>
How the vape king of teen nicotine addiction rose and fell in San Francisco

‘Hey, Juul, don’t let the door hit you on the way out’

Most Read