The San Francisco Board of Supevisors unanimously passed new legislation to protect tenants from landlords who abuse owner-move in evictions. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

How owner move-in reform will affect SF tenants and landlords

Owner move-in reform unanimously passed through the Board of Supervisors on July 18. This reform adds enforcement mechanisms to protect tenants from landlords who abuse OMI evictions and never intend to move in. Here is what this new legislation means for tenants and landlords:

This legislation, aptly named “Administrative Code – Owner Move-In Reporting Requirements,” primarily impacts landlords by requiring new and improved reporting requirements. Landlords are now required to provide a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that they intend on residing in the unit for at least 36 continuous months. In addition, the Rent Board is now required to annually notify the unit occupant of the maximum allowable rent (which is the rent of the previous tenant) for five years after an OMI.

This reform also extends the amount of time that a tenant has to exercise their rights and keep landlords accountable. Landlords must offer the unit first to the displaced tenant for a period of five years after the OMI. Additionally, tenants now have five years, the new statute of limitations, to file wrongful eviction claims based on an unlawful OMI if the owner fails to move in.

Finally, and perhaps the most significantly, nonprofits like the Housing Rights Committee and the San Francisco Tenants Union will be able to exercise a “right of action” to enforce the law. When tenants are threatened with an OMI eviction, they might feel relieved when their landlord offers more time or more money. But often, in exchange, the tenant must agree to waive their right to sue even if the landlord does move in. Likewise, if there is a new tenant living in a unit where an OMI eviction has occurred, they fear retaliation if they choose to exercise their rights. Now, nonprofits can act to hold the landlord accountable in court to ensure that San Francisco does not continue to lose affordable units through pressure and fraud.

Effective enforcement mechanisms were passed because tenant advocates pushed for real solutions. These changes do not impact landlords who intend on acting in good faith; landlords who do not intend on breaking the law should not fear being punished for breaking the law. If you are a tenant who is curious about the existing rules around OMI evictions, if you are experiencing an OMI eviction, or if you suspect you have been a victim of a fraudulent OMI, visit the Housing Rights Committee or the San Francisco Tenants Union during tenant counseling for more information.

Cynthia Fong is a community organizer with the Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco in the Richmond District.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

School district, teachers reach tentative agreement on distance learning

With less than two weeks until the start of the school year,… Continue reading

Retired officers seek end to decade-old age discrimination case

Retired officer Juanita Stockwell was 60 when she and her colleagues first… Continue reading

San Francisco schools estimate $25m needed to close digital divide

Private donations being sought to fund internet access, technology

State officials sue Uber and Lyft for wage theft

California Labor Commissioner’s Office alleges ride-hail companies violating AB5

SFMTA Board passes ‘clean’ sales tax ballot measure to fund Caltrain

After a weeks-long impasse, tri-county leadership appears to have reached a compromise

Most Read