House Dems preparing big tax hike

We’ve written in this space before about how Senate Democrats are preparing a 2008 budget that will require massive tax hikes to satisfy their “pay-as-you-go” budgeting rule. That rule requires a matching revenue source for any proposed increase in federal spending.

It turns out House Democrats are wrestling with the same problem, as they contemplate changes in the Alternative Minimum Tax to exempt middle class families and individual taxpayers from the odious levy. Doing so produces a revenue gap of as much as $650 billion over a 10-year period, depending upon how extensive are the AMT changes. Presently, Democrats reportedly are looking at exempting folks with incomes below about $250,000.

But raising tax rates to make up for changes in the AMT introduces more distortions into an economy that already has to cope with a tax code that long ago became ridiculously complex and burdensome. One of the hikes House Democrats are looking at is raising the top AMT bracket to 31.5 percent from its present 28 percent. Supporters of the hikes will engage in subtle — or not so subtle — class warfare, appealing to those lower on the socio-economic ladder that the “rich” can handle the increases.

But what that tactic will fail to point out is the fact that higher tax rates often don’t produce more revenue for the government. In fact, the opposite is usually the case, as is dramatically illustrated by capital gains tax rates since the Steiger amendment ignited the supply side revolution in 1978: Revenues went up as rates went down. Even so, Democratic tax writers are also preparing to hike capital gains levies for upper income taxpayers snared by the AMT.

That leaves individual income tax rates, which likely will have to be raised much more than House Democrats want to admit for top taxpayers. Remember the confiscatory tax rates and stagflation (high interest and inflation rates) of the 1970s?

Sugar-coat their proposals as they certainly will, a return to the days of leisure suits, disco and economic decline is what House Democrats will give us if they join their Senate colleagues in massively raising Americans’ federal taxes.

General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco police investigated the scene of a police shooting near Varney Place and Third Street on May 7. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFPD shooting may prompt new body camera rules for plainclothes cops

Police chief says incident ‘should not have happened’

Governor Gavin Newsom speaks at a news conference about a $12 billion package bolstering the state’s response to the homelessness crisis at the Kearney Vista Apartments on May 11, 2021 in San Diego, California. (K.C. Alfred/The San Diego Union-Tribune/TNS)
Newsom promises sweeping change in California’s $267-billion budget

John Myers Los Angeles Times California would embark on the most ambitious… Continue reading

Despite the pandemic, San Francisco has ended the fiscal year with a budget surplus. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Better than expected tax revenues leave city with $157.3M surplus for this year

As the fiscal year nears an end and Mayor London Breed prepares… Continue reading

Passengers board a BART train bound for the San Francisco Airport at Powell Street station. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
BART bumps up service restoration to August 30, offers fare discounts

Rail agency breaks pandemic ridership records, prepares to welcome more passengers

Ashley and Michelle Monterrosa hold a photo of their brother Sean Monterrosa, who was killed by a Vallejo police officer early Tuesday morning, as they are comforted at a memorial rally at the 24th Street Mission BART plaza on Friday, June 5, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
State Department of Justice to investigate Sean Monterrosa shooting by Vallejo police

Attorney General Rob Bonta steps in after Solano County DA declines case

Most Read