Governor’s veto of Leno privacy bill is disappointing

Tech-savvy residents of the Bay Area carry around smartphones and tablet computers, devices that have allowed us to do vast amounts of work on the go while staying connected with friends and family. But as people walk around with these devices, they are collecting large amounts of data, including where they are at any given time — information that reveals much about our personal and professional lives.

Many people would be surprised to know that police officers can, without a warrant, gather location information from electronic devices, including cellphones, tablets and car navigation devices. This information can obviously help aid them in crime fighting, by placing a person at the scene of a crime or tracing his or her interaction with other people.

But most other such searches of  property by law enforcement officials require a warrant — a judicial process that requires the approval of a court or magistrate. The system in place for other searches and seizures forces the police to show probable cause. However, the collection of location information from mobile devices contains no such safeguard.

Senate Bill 1434 by State Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, would have required law enforcement officers to use the same warrant process they use for other personal information when gathering such location data. The bill passed both houses of the state Legislature, before landing on the desk of Gov. Jerry Brown.

Leno’s bill also would have required authorities to record and disclose in a timely manner all requests for such location information from mobile devices. Service providers would have had to disclose the number of times location information was handed over to law enforcement, the number of times such requests were denied, and the number of users whose information was surrendered.

With smartphone use a burgeoning area of contemporary life, Leno’s bill makes sense. It would protect people’s privacy by making law enforcement go through proper channels to gain access to very personal information. Providing transparency into data about such requests also would allow people and privacy advocates to watch for abuse by law enforcement officials.

But people will have no such protections in California since Brown vetoed the legislation. “It may be that legislative action is needed to keep the law current in our rapidly evolving electronic age,” Brown wrote in his veto message. “But I am not convinced that this bill strikes the right balance between the operational needs of law enforcement and individual expectations of privacy.”

Requiring police officers to get a warrant for searches of personal information is not a terribly high bar. So it is disappointing that Brown does not support a level of privacy protections on par with those already existing. Technology always evolves faster than legislation, and Leno’s bill would have been a step toward protecting privacy and information in a sector of life that has sped ahead of  laws on the books.

We hope Leno will reintroduce the bill during the next legislative cycle, and that Brown can then be convinced the error of his ways.

editorialsJerry BrownMark LenoOpinionTablet computers

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

A ban on smoking or vaping in multi-unit buildings has drawn opposition from cannabis advocates, who say it would leave users with no legal place to consume a legal substance. (Shutterstock)
Cannabis group slams Yee’s proposed apartment smoking ban as ‘classist’

Legislation would impose fines of $1,000 a day on repeat violators

The most dangerous behaviors by drivers include failing to yield right-of-way at crosswalks, unsafe speeding and failing to stop at red lights or stop signs. <ins>(Ekevara Kitpowsong/Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Hetch Hetchy in Yosemite, which supplies water to San Francisco, is among the concerns of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, which is undergoing a change of leadership. <ins>(Courtesy SFPUC)</ins>
Changes in leadership at SFPUC spark concern, hope for future water policy

Will agency’s new commissioner continue to support Big Ag?

Supervisor Shamann Walton joined with community members to speak out against rising homicides, which have taken a heavy toll in the Bayview-Hunters Point in 2020. (Samantha Laurey/ Special to S.F Examiner)
SF homicides surpass 2019 total with month left in year

Police attribute rise to COVID-19, shootings and deadly gang violence

A screenshot from SFPD body worn camera
New videos show police shooting man armed with knife, frying pan

Police say Antonio Estrada set fire to apartment building before shooting

Most Read