Financial crisis panel suffers partisan breakdown

When the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission blew past its congressionally mandated Dec. 15 deadline to issue its report explaining the origins of the Great Recession of 2008, the panel's Democratic majority unilaterally decided to complete its work by a date yet to be determined in January. By effectively ignoring the very law that created it, the commission majority exemplified the irresponsible approach of the 111th Congress to virtually every issue it addressed, including Obamacare, the economic stimulus and passage of a federal budget. As happened in Congress in 2009 and most of 2010, the Democratic majority running the FCIC did as it pleased, with little input from the four Republican members.

At every step along the way, FCIC Chairman Phil Angelides — the former Democratic state treasurer of California — undermined his panel's credibility and squandered taxpayer money by refusing to conduct his work in an open manner. He constantly complained about having too little time (more than a year) and insufficient funding ($6 million from taxpayers, not including the salaries of civil service detailees from the Federal Reserve and Treasury, among other government agencies).

When

The Examiner requested resumes and other information on each commission staff member, Angelides refused until we editorialized about the commission's marked lack of transparency. He then released a partial staff list that did not include names of contractors or staff salaries. When we uncovered evidence of multiple conflicts of interest among the commission's staff, Angelides simply refused to talk about who he hired or why, even as he acknowledged the possibility of those conflicts.

No wonder Republican commissioner Peter Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute said the “bipartisan” process that was supposed to prevail in the commission's deliberations was “not well-managed.” Wallison noted that “we had 15 months to do this study, and it should have been completed on time.” A source familiar with the FCIC's work told

The Examiner that the commission's partisan atmosphere intensified after the November election, with multiple roll call votes required merely to resolve even simple issues like language.

Republican commissioner Keith Hennessey said the majority voted en masse “to limit the minority's opportunity to express our views in the commercial book version of the upcoming report. In a 512-page book that will be for sale at commercial bookstores, those who dissent are now allotted nine pages each.” When he suggested increasing the length of the commercial book to allow room for additional views, he was turned down because it “might add $1 to the sale price of the book.”

editorialsNEPOpinion

Just Posted

ose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014. 
Rose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014.
Willie and Rose: An alliance for the ages

How the Mayor and Chinatown activist shaped San Francisco, then and now

San Francisco supervisors are considering plans to replace trash cans — a “Renaissance” garbage can is pictured on Market Street — with pricey, unnecessary upgrades. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco must end ridiculous and expensive quest for ‘pretty’ trash cans

SF’s unique and pricey garbage bins a dream of disgraced former Public Works director

Giants right fielder Mike Yastrzemski is pictured at bat on July 29 against the Dodgers at Oracle Park; the teams are in the top spots in their league as the season closes. (Chris Victorio/Special to The Examiner)
With playoff positions on the line, old rivalries get new life

Giants cruised through season, Dodgers not far behind

Golden Gate Park visitors may take a survey about options regarding private car access on John F. Kennedy Drive, which has been the subject of controversy during the pandemic.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Your chance to weigh in: Should JFK remain closed to cars?

Host of mobility improvements for Golden Gate Park proposed

Drivers gathered to urge voters to reject an initiative that would exempt Uber, Lyft, and other gig economy companies from state labor laws, in San Francisco in October 2020. (Jim Wilson/New York Times)
What’s the role of unions in the 21st century?

As membership declines in California, economic inequality increases

Most Read