Examiner Editorial: Reid swindles public with vote-buying tactics

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada this week is doing what he always does when he needs votes to pass a bill President Barack Obama favors but the public opposes: He goes behind closed doors to cut deals and buys votes. For example, to get to the 60 votes needed to pass the motion to proceed to debate on Obamacare, Reid came up with arcane legislative language that netted $300 million in federal assistance tailored for Louisiana.

That sweetener temporarily bought Reid custody of Sen. Mary Landreiu’s vote, but she quickly made it clear that he will have to raise the ante to get her vote for final passage. That is business as usual on the road to Obamacare.

This week, Reid goes back behind closed doors in search of more deals in the quest for final passage of the Senate version of Obamacare.

Reid’s problem is two-fold.

First, a handful of Senate Democrats say they unalterably oppose something in the bill, but going too far in satisfying them risks alienating other Senate Democrats who unalterably favor whatever it is they oppose. The logical assumption is that Reid prefers to operate behind closed doors because he doesn’t want the public to see the ugly reality behind Senate Democrats’ support for Obamacare. Or, maybe he just prefers the world not see him pull his hair out as one proposed vote-buying deal after another falls through.

Second, public opposition grows as this Obamacare vote-buying process drags on and people know more about the bill. The latest data from Gallup find more respondents saying they would advise their congressman to vote against Obamacare than saying they would encourage a vote for it, 49 to 44 percent. Obamacare support has been declining among Republicans, Democrats and independents, according to Gallup, “falling by 6 points among Democrats, 8 among independents and 12 among Republicans.” Those figures were produced between Nov. 20 and 22, meaning the heavy lobbying earlier in the month by the White House and its special interest allies like AARP and the AMA made no dent in public opposition.

Reid’s frantic vote-buying only fuels this growing opposition as his numerous deals are exposed. As the National Center for Policy Analysis’ John Goodman points out, it didn’t have to be this way. This unsavory vote-buying spectacle became inevitable at the outset when Obama, Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ignored Republicans in crafting health care reform. That made every potential recalcitrant Democrat’s vote ever more valuable. Just ask the $300 million lady from Louisiana.

editorialsOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Newsom orders 2035 phaseout of gas-powered vehicles, calls for fracking ban

By Phil Willon, Tony Barboza Los Angeles Times Emphasizing that California must… Continue reading

Supes seek answers after Human Resources manager accused of forgery

Black employees group blames incident on department leadership

Emergency transit-only lanes on Geary could help ease crowding on buses

SFMTA proposal intended to help commuting essential workers

Port Commission backs 850-unit development plan for Piers 30-32

Critics argue project may require voter approval under Prop. B

Supes approve $13.6B city budget in a 10-1 vote

Supervisor Stefani calls proposal ‘fiscally irresponsible’ in lone ‘nay’ vote

Most Read