Examiner Editorial: Oversight means better (and less) government

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, is set to become chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if   Republicans regain the majority in the House of Representatives, which many polls suggest is a solid possibility.

It’s not one of the glory committees, but it is potentially among the most powerful and important because it can investigate any federal program. This makes service on the committee an opportunity for even the most humble representative to help combat the waste, fraud and abuse that inevitably comes with ever-expanding government. Issa told CNN this week that he would support legislation to give subpoena power to all of the 74 inspectors general in the executive branch. “We need the IGs to get answers,” he said. “I don’t need to be looking at every failure of government, I need to be looking at where failure of government needs reform. You bring it back to Congress and we fix it.” Issa is exactly right.

Nervous Democrats and the liberal mainstream media have been sounding alarms for months about the prospect of a tough Republican like Issa at the helm of the committee, pointing to the chimera of new investigations of the White House reminiscent of those in the Clinton years.  But enabling inspectors general — who are appointed by the president but report to Congress — to issue subpoenas would reduce political grandstanding and add teeth to investigations that would otherwise be derailed by evasive agency officials. In fact, the one IG presently with subpoena power (for the Department of Defense) rarely uses it. The threat, on the other hand, can be a powerful tool to encourage people to be more forthcoming with information.

The Examiner inquired whether the conservative House Republican Study Committee would support Issa’s proposal, but while supportive, a spokesman seemed unfamiliar with it. This is a worrisome sign House GOPers still aren’t thinking seriously about oversight.

Congressional subpoenas and public hearings are the “ultimate weapons” given to Congress by the Constitution, because the Founders knew ambitious politicians and compliant bureaucrats in the executive branch should know they are being watched closely and continually. Special Treasury Department IG Neil Barofsky was the key reason the public learned of the abuses in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). We know, for instance, that the Obama administration acted too quickly in forcing the closure of General Motors and Chrysler dealerships, “thereby adding tens of thousands of workers to the already lengthy unemployment rolls.” An IG like  Barofsky would be even more effective if given subpoena power. Regardless of the election outcome, Issa’s proposal should be adopted.

editorialeditorialsOpinionSFExaminer

Just Posted

The numbers show nearly 14 percent of San Francisco voters who participated in the Sept. 14 recall election wanted to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from elected office. (Shutterstock photo)
(Shutterstock photo)
How San Francisco neighborhoods voted in the Newsom recall

Sunset tops the list as the area with the most ‘yes’ votes

Alison Collins, a member of the San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education, listens during a board meeting. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Alison Collins speaks: Embattled SF school board member confronts the recall effort

‘It’s important for folks to know what this recall is about. It’s bigger than any one of us.’

Passengers board a BART train at Powell Street station on Friday, Oct. 23, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Powell Station death serves as a grim reminder. BART doors don’t stop for anyone

What you need to know about safety sensors on the trains

A group of Asian American protesters demonstrate outside the Hall of Justice in May 2021 following a series of violent attacks. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Asian American groups activated by violence and prejudice

‘There is a newfound sense of fighting back … push come to shove’

Is the Black Cat affair a distraction from the recovery of The City’s storied nightlife industry or does Mayor Breed’s behavior inadvertently highlight the predicament the industry’s been in since San Francisco reinstated indoor mask requirements on Aug. 20? (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner, 2021)
Mayor Breed mask controversy highlights nightlife businesses’ plight

‘It’s what all the venues and bars are living every single day’

Most Read