Examiner Editorial: More jobs, not more government

When the November jobs report came out this week showing unemployment at 10 percent, we could have sworn we heard White House press secretary quietly humming “Happy Days are Here Again!” Officially, Robert Gibbs was more restrained, saying he thought “the numbers today show that we continue to make much-needed progress in getting this economy going again and in getting the right trend going in hiring.” But one look at the Obama administration’s agenda shows Gibbs’ boss is mainly interested in more  government, not more jobs.

Take the stimulus. In January 2008, unemployment stood at 4.9 percent, so President George W. Bush felt inspired to work with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to pass a $168 billion economic stimulus bill. One year later, 3.5 million jobs had been lost, even as unemployment rose to 7.6 percent. So President Barack Obama pushed through a new $787 billion stimulus package, promising it would keep unemployment below 8 percent and “create or save” 3.5 million jobs. If Congress didn’t pass it, he warned, unemployment would rise to 9 percent by 2010. Those were the days.

Then there’s the job-killing cap-and-trade bill. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the GDP would grow more slowly under that scheme and jobs would be “adversely impacted.” In fact, the green jobs growth promised by the administration has been interminably slow in coming — a wind turbine plant in western Pennsylvania, for example, just announced it was laying off half its 280 workers, General Electric is closing a solar panel factory in Delaware, and Evergreen Solar, despite receiving aid to open a factory near Boston, is moving most of its assembly to China. Spain, whose widely reported efforts to create green jobs did little to improve its economy, saw unemployment reach 19 percent in September, the second highest in the European Union.

Obama also promised that his $2 billion “cash for clunkers” program would spur growth in the auto industry, but once the government spending spree ended, General Motors’ sales plunged 36 percent from August to September. Chrysler and Ford dropped 37 and 33 percent respectively.

If there’s an underlying theme here, it’s that private enterprise is still the incredible jobs-creation machine when left alone. But economic meltdowns, recessions and other unintended consequences ensure when the Big Brother economic engineering favored by Obama takes over. The time-tested remedies do not require a summit. Cut taxes, lower trade barriers, and let the American people do what they do best: Work hard, take risks, build small businesses into big ones, increase prosperity for everybody. What’s not to like about that?

editorialsOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

BART Ambassadors are being called on to assist riders in social situations that don’t require police force. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Unarmed BART ambassadors program formalized with a focus on community service

Public safety and police reform are key elements in campaigns of Board members Dufty and Simon

On Oct. 13, people lined up to vote early for the presidential election in Southlake, Texas. <ins>(Shutterstock)</ins>
<ins></ins>
Five things to watch for in the run-up to Nov. 3

Down-ballot races, as much as the presidency, will determine the future course of this nation

WeChat (Shutterstock)
U.S. District Court denies Trump request to shutdown WeChat app

A federal judge in San Francisco denied a request by the U.S.… Continue reading

School board members Gabriela Lopez (left) and Alison Collins (right) say they have been the subject of frequent hateful, racist and sexist attacks during their time on the school board. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F Examiner)
Angered by Lowell decision, SFUSD grad targets school board members with violent imagery

Facebook page depicts two women of color on board with swastikas and x-marks on their faces

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer, a former school board member, said it was ‘ridiculous’ that the school district did not yet have a plan to reopen. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supervisors demand SFUSD set a timeline for reopening

Pressure grows on district to resume in-person learning as The City’s COVID-19 case count goes down

Most Read