Education after affirmative action

Like California 10 years ago, Michigan will vote today on a ballot initiative to ban racial preferences in government. Opponents fear the ban will diminish educational opportunities for blacks and Hispanics, leading to lily-white campuses, especially at the University of Michigan — the UC Berkeley of the Midwest.

It’s 10 years since Californians passed Proposition 209, the initiative that ended racial preferences in government employment, education and contracting. And a close look at data from the University of California system reveals a multihued picture in which all groups, on balance, have benefited in unintended and unexpected ways.

It is true that after Prop. 209 went into effect, as opponents had predicted, black and Hispanic populations at California’s two most elite universities — Berkeley and UCLA — dropped by nearly half and have never fully recovered. According to admissions data, between 1995 and 2004, black admissions to Berkeley dropped from 6.66 percent to 3.59 percent and Hispanics from 17 to 10.22 percent. UCLA reported similar drops.

Yet, despite these drops, the overall population of minority students across the University of California system has remained remarkably stable. This is because post-Prop. 209, black and Hispanic students didn’t give up on a higher education — they simply entered colleges for which they were more qualified. Indeed, schools such as UC Riverside and UC Santa Cruz have seen minority enrollments increase, with Riverside alone reporting a 240 percent increase in black admissions.

Four-year graduation rates for blacks at UC San Diego, for example, doubled from 26 percent in 1995 to 52 percent in 2001 — nearly on par with whites and Asians. Similarly, Mexican-American graduation rates are up from 27 percent in 1995 to 42 percent in 2001.

But Prop. 209 has not only improved minority performance at colleges but also in high schools. Unable torely on preferences to recruit minorities, universities have redoubled their efforts to prepare low-income students in school districts with low college participation rates, notes Eryn Hadley in the Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law. Among other things, they have started partnering with these schools to develop courses that better prepare students for college.

The upshot? Minority high-school graduation rates have risen post-Prop. 209, reports Hadley.

But what about the spots vacated by blacks and Hispanics at the elite universities? At Berkeley, it turns out most have gone to Asians, whose enrollment has risen from 38 percent in 1995 to about 46 percent in 2004. At UCLA, they have been split between whites and Asians.

In both schools Asians represent more than 40 percent of the student population — even though they are only 12 percent of the state’s general population. This means California’s elite colleges are the first among their national peers, thanks to Prop. 209, to treat Asians fairly.

Asians applying to elite schools don’t benefit from minority preferences — because they are not regarded as underrepresented. At the same time, The Wall Street Journal’s Daniel Golden recently documented that because Asians are often first-generation immigrants, they don’t qualify for legacy preferences either. The result is they lose out both to less qualified black and white students. They need to score at least 50 points higher than non-Asians on standardized tests just to be in the game.

It is likely that if Michigan follows California and Washington state in banning racial preferences, it will ignite a nationwide trend. California’s experience suggests that this prospect should not be greeted with dread — but optimism.

Exactly what adjustments race-neutral policies might trigger will depend, among other things, on the demographics of each state. Michigan, for instance, can confidently expect: black and Hispanic graduation rates — lagging 17 percent behind whites and Asians — to catch up; Asian student population at the University of Michigan to increase along with that of Arab-Americans given that Michigan is home to the biggest Arab-American population outside the Mideast; and K-12 education might well improve for many low-income students.

As 10 years of California experience shows, ending racial preferences will lead to a more just system that will produce what economists call “Pareto-optimal outcomes” where all groups are better off — and none worse off.

Shikha Dalmia is a senior analyst at Reason Foundation, a free-market think tank in Los Angeles. Henry Payne is a freelance writer and an editorial cartoonist at the Detroit News.General OpinionOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Dr. Vincent Matthews, superintendent of the San Francisco Unified School District, on Monday said “We truly wish we could return to in-person learning for everyone.” (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFUSD reopening plans still leave out most secondary students

SFUSD announces April return to in-person learning after reaching contract deal with teachers

(Examiner file photo)
Charter amendment effort would replace elected school board with appointed body

Critics of the San Francisco Unified School District board on Monday formally… Continue reading

Jill Bonny, owner of Studio Kazoku tattoo parlor in the Haight, tattoos client Lam Vo on Friday, March 5, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
No one was fighting for tattoo artists, so they started advocating for themselves

Jill Bonny has been tattooing in the Bay Area since 2000. Four… Continue reading

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted changes to The City's streets including Slow Streets closures to increase open space access and the Shared Spaces program, which allows businesses to use public right-of-ways for dining, retail and services. (Examiner illustration)
COVID is reshaping the streets of San Francisco

Walk down Page Street, which is closed to thru-traffic, and you might… Continue reading

(Go Nakamura/Getty Images/TNS)
Fully vaccinated? Here are the CDC guidelines for what you can do after receiving a COVID vaccine

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Monday issued its… Continue reading

Most Read