Editorial: SFSU’s awkwardly planned expansion

It’s become axiomatic that college degrees should be universal. So unquestioned is the desirability of post-secondary schooling for everyone that the Democrats made subsidizing it a plank in their successful campaign to recapture Congress. And what campus isn’t planning a major expansion, as indeed San Francisco State University now contemplates?

Some sort of competitive drive no doubt animates these renovations, even within the state university system. The Bay Area, of course, prizes its countless campuses, both public and private, and has earned its reputation as home to the most redundantly schooled people on earth. And, yes, we do distinguish, as Mark Twain did, between schooling and education, but that’s an issue for another day.

What SFSU wants to do, by the year 2020, is expand throughout The City’s southwest corner by another 10 acres, adding 900,000 square feet of building space. Campus planners anticipate 5,000 more full-time students, the projected total for the moment resting at 25,000, and hope to accommodate them.

You may be thinking that a local school bureaucracy poised to close several elementary and high schools, this sad development owing to The City’s notorious family exodus, belies SFSU’s demographic fantasy. From where would these 5,000 additional matriculants come? That would miss the cosmopolitan point: The local colleges recruit — again, competitively — among prospective students worldwide.

So much for the organic connection long ago thought to exist between community and campus. And never mind that, sometime within the next decade and a half, the targeted number of students almost certainly will change. Fresh planners might even find it unrealistic.

SFSU’s expansionists apparently have breached another local connection. Members of the Parkmerced Residents’ Organization, an elderly community neighboring the campus, fear the plans could destroy 3,400 housing units, which the university denies. Thus do two liberal social objectives clash, pitting the generations against each other.

Complains Lora Traveler, Parkmerced’s president emeritus: “We are up in arms and we are angry. This is a dangerous program that will leave seniors dislocated.” The university, you see, announced the plans without a feasibility report. This is how they teach urban planning at SFSU?

If the Parkmerced Residents’ Organization problem weren’t embarrassing enough, the university announced extracurricular plans that raise obvious questions about how it defines the nature of its business. Indeed, it wants to go into business. Beyond the new greenbelts and enlarged recreational fields, among other landscape niceties it plans to supervise, SFSU wants to go into the hotel and conference center business.

We haven’t heard from The City’s hotel industry, but we’re wondering if 250 state-owned rooms would be welcomed — unless SFSU intends to compete with Cornell’s famed hotel school and train local hotel staff. Now, that sort of thinking just might fit into the university’s mission, but the community needs to be sold.

editorialsOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The J Church train could begin running again later this month on at least part of its surface route. (Mira Laing/Special to S.F. Examiner)
First Muni trains will return to service Dec. 19

Three additional bus routes coming back online in January

Smoking cannabis. (Shutterstock)
Supes ban tobacco smoking in apartments but exempt cannabis

San Francisco banned smoking and vaping of tobacco in apartments Tuesday night,… Continue reading

Dr. Grant Colfax and Mayor London Breed said new restrictions could come this week due to rising COVID-19 cases.<ins> (Examiner screenshot)</ins>
Breed: ‘More restrictive action’ needed to slow spread of COVID-19

San Francisco officials said Tuesday tougher restrictions will soon be imposed to… Continue reading

Many landlords fought the proposal requiring them to register properties, calling it an invasion of privacy. 
Kevin N. Hume/
S.F. Examiner
Housing inventory wins unanimous approval from supervisors

Legislation will require landlords to register properties, report vacancies and rents

Harlan Kelly, head of the SFPUC and husband to City Administrator Naomi Kelly (right), faces federal charges for allegedly trading inside information on a city contract in return for a paid family vacation. (Courtesy photo)
Harlan Kelly, head of SFPUC, charged with fraud in widening Nuru scandal

Kelly accused of engaging in corrupt partnership with permit expediter

Most Read