Editorial: Getting the mule’s attention

If the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission was following that old-folk advice about training a mule — “First you hit it over the head with a 2-by-4 to get its attention” — then its threat to sue Daly City over delays in fixing the recurrent city line flooding probably succeeded.

So now it is time for both city governments to meet and hammer out a realistic and practical program to double the drainage capacity of the Vista Grande basin. Daly City stormwater overflows at the San Francisco city line during particularly heavy winter rains every few years.

The last major flood damage was in 2004, shutting down John Muir Drive and polluting Lake Merced with toxins such as E. coli, as well as causing water damage to dozens of homes and businesses in both cities. Incensed over millions of dollars in prior cleanup costs covering more than 30 years, the Utilities Commission is demanding that Daly City meet a Dec. 1 deadline for agreeing on a construction timetable to remedy the drainage problems.

“The last time we thought we came to an agreement was two years ago and no progress has been made since,” SFPUC spokesman Tony Winnicker said. He did add that litigation is not in anyone’s best interest and the SFPUC prefers to work with Daly City in a good faith effort that achieves real progress toward funding a specific plan with a specific timetable.

At this writing, Daly City had not yet issued an official response to the SFPUC ultimatum. However, Daly City Director of Water and Wastewater Resources Patrick Sweetland told The Examiner that nearly $4 million has already been budgeted for flood-related construction near Vista Grande over the next three years.

The city plans to go out to bid within two months on engineering research to determine the best of three proposals that would add more drainage capacity to the area, with total improvement costs estimated to reach as much as $165 million, Sweetland said.

As we all know, construction deadlines tend to slip and bureaucracies have a universal tendency to delay taking action on problems not seen as immediately pressing. So it is probably a good thing that San Francisco took out a two-by-four. But having gotten Daly City’s attention, it is time for the posturing to end.

These two neighbors should now get started on serious negotiations to produce an acceptably realistic construction and budgeting timeline by the end of the year.

editorialsOpinion

Just Posted

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Most Read