Editorial: Activist judges not limited to U.S.

Americans not only have to be on guard against judicial activism here at home, but also an aggressive version overseas. Our domestic courts routinely bypass the legislative process and unelected judges take it upon themselves to decide such controversial issues as gay marriage and eminent domain, but European judges are busy redefining international law. That could be an even bigger problem, as it threatens to undermine the United States’ ability to act as a sovereign nation.

Speaking recently before the Federalist Society, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff warned that “judicial modesty” — a sense that there are limits to what a court can do — is largely absent inEurope, where “customary international law,” largely defined by the writings of international law experts (in other words, foreign academics) has already clashed with one nation’s right to defend itself.

In 2004, Chertoff noted, the International Court of Justice “waded into a thicket” when it ruled that the wall Israel built on the West Bank specifically to keep out suicide bombers was a violation of international law because the Israelis could not link ongoing terrorist attacks to any specific state.

And according to prevailing legal notions, “it doesn’t matter when the U.S. refuses to ratify a treaty — we’re still bound by customary international law,” Chertoff added, which also mandates that “a critical element of federalism — specific acts of Congress — are just an impediment to be brushed aside.” In other words, activist international courts are attempting to exercise jurisdiction over sovereign nations, whether the people or their leaders like it or not.

So far, the U.S. has resisted such pressures. But they come at a particularly bad time in the global war on terror when Western democracies need to be cooperating with each other.

Following the Sept. 11 attacks, Congress mandated the collection of personal data from airlines as a way to prevent terrorists from entering the country. As Chertoff correctly pointed out, deciding who comes in — and who doesn’t — “is a core power of any sovereign nation.”

However, in May the International Court of Justice annulled a 2004 agreement that provides U.S. authorities electronic access to 34 data fields from all trans-Atlantic flights because the information is collected in Europe — even though the passengers are headed for the U.S. An interim agreement continuing the program was signed last month, but Chertoff says Europeans still believe they’re entitled to determine how the U.S. uses the information, including names of passengers, reservation dates, billing information and travel itineraries. If links are found to terrorist groups, the individual is immediately placed on a “no fly” list.

“If you don’t want to give up the information, then you don’t need to take the trip to the U.S.,” DHS Assistant Secretary Stewart Baker said last month, succinctly laying out the American position. Though the European Community temporarily caved in to Washington’s demands, Chertoff worries that the “activism on steroids” exhibited by international courts and U.N. committees will continue to chip away at U.S. sovereignty.

And the fact that the Supreme Court has begun to cite “international law” in some of its rulings instead of the Constitution the justices are sworn to uphold is cause for further alarm.

editorialsOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott listens at a rally to commemorate the life of George Floyd and others killed by police outside City Hall on Monday, June 1, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Will the Biden Administration help SF speed up police reform?

City has struggled to implement changes without federal oversight

Lowell High School (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Students, families call for culture shift at Lowell after racist incident

District to explore changes including possible revision of admissions policy

Alan Wong was among California National Guard members deployed to Sacramento to provide security the weekend before the presidential inauguration. (Courtesy photo)
CCSF board member tests positive for COVID-19 after National Guard deployment

Alan Wong spent eight days in Sacramento protecting State Capitol before Inauguration Day

Due to a lack of votes in his favor, record-holding former Giant Barry Bonds (pictured at tribute to Willie McCovey in 2018) will not be entering the National Baseball Hall of Fame in the near future.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Ex-Giants star Barry Bonds again falls short of Hall of Fame

After striking out yet again in his bid to join Major League… Continue reading

San Francisco firefighter Keith Baraka has filed suit against The City alleging discrimination on the basis of race and sexual orientation.<ins></ins>
Gay black firefighter sues city for discrimination

A San Francisco firefighter who says he was harassed and discriminated against… Continue reading

Most Read