David Sirota: A week of living with low impact on the environment

“Will you join me in lowering our impact?”

That was the subject line on a recent e-mail I sent out to family, friends, column readers and radio listeners asking them to join me for a week in trying to reduce our individual environmental footprint.

Inspired by Colin Beavan's prophetic book “No Impact Man,” I proposed four pollution- and waste-reducing steps many people could try for a few days: Stop consuming meat, devote one meal a day to eating only locally grown products, avoid producing nonrecyclable garbage and refrain from riding in a fossil-fuel burning vehicle with fewer than three people.

Having now completed this Low-Impact Week, I can report that it was not easy and that I did not achieve perfection — not even close. However, I can also say I learned a few things beyond how to manage bicycle-seat discomfort.

For one, I discovered that you can find affordable food that isn't flown in at great energy expense — but it takes initiative. You have to check food labels at the grocery or hunt down a farmers market.

I was also reminded that we waste an obscene amount of paper and plastic. Coffee cups, disposable utensils, food wrappers — this offal is everywhere, and most of it is used for less than 15 minutes and then discarded.

Avoiding this trash for a week makes you think about the monstrous amount of energy used in producing, distributing and tossing it.

When it came to transportation, I discovered that the inconvenience of eco-friendly choices can come with unforeseen benefits. Sure, it took effort to get my bike working.

Sure, my “not a morning person” gene didn't love sweating my way to the office at dawn. But my “I hate traffic” and “I like saving money” genes enjoyed avoiding congestion and gasoline bills.

These embarrassingly self-evident realizations led to my two biggest Low-Impact Week epiphanies of all.

The first is that a lot of environmental pollution comes from our aversion to basic forethought and from our on-demand culture. Think about it: We use so many disposable products simply because we don't even think to bring our own.

Many people have come to rely on cars — rather than public transit, bicycling or walking — in part because we're not willing to plan ahead for train times, organize car pools or perspire a bit, and we like the idea of driving whenever we want to drive, rather than conforming to a schedule. And many don't eat locally grown food, not because it's necessarily expensive, but because we just don't enjoy inspecting labels — and because we feel entitled to eat whatever we desire, regardless of season.

My second realization is about the nature of environmental solutions. Dick Cheney famously told America that “conservation may be a sign of personal virtue but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy.”

And lots of liberals will insist, as one reader recently did, that “do-gooder” attempts to reduce personal pollution harm environmental causes because they “make conservation a purely individual effort.”

But with global temperatures rising and a Texas-sized island of garbage in the Pacific Ocean, it's clear that we need both individual and collective action. Arguments to the contrary — claims that individual actions are insignificant and that the only important actions come from government — are self-interested cop-outs designed to let a nation of buck-passers simultaneously feign conscientiousness and rationalize individual gluttony.

Accepting these truisms over the course of a week only makes me want to once again ask: Will you join me in lowering our impact? You can pretend that question isn't important, but the truth is obvious: Our planet's future rests on your answer.

Examiner Columnist David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books “Hostile Takeover” and “The Uprising.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com

David SirotaOp Edsop-edOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The admissions process at the academically competitive Lowell High School is set to change this year due to coronavirus restritions. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Lowell’s selective admissions process put on hold this year — and more changes may be in the works

School board votes unanimously to use normal student assignment lottery for competitive school

Dr. Vincent Matthews, superintendent of the San Francisco Unified School District, said Tuesday that student would not be back in school before the end of this calendar year. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Superintendent: City schools will not reopen before the end of the year

San Francisco public schools won’t reopen to students for the rest of… Continue reading

San Francisco has failed to reduce traffic deaths enough to meet its Vision Zero goal. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
San Francisco not on track to meet Vision Zero goals by 2024

Hamstrung by state laws, dwindling budget and limited resources, SFMTA tries to chart path forward

San Francisco will allow bars selling drinks, and not food, to begin serving customers outdoors under health guidelines going into effect next month. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF becomes first Bay Area County to move to least restrictive COVID-19 category

Change to ‘yellow’ will allow more indoor dining and fitness, reopening non-essential offices

City officials want to install more red light cameras but the process is costly and time consuming. (Shutterstock)
Transit officials push for more red light cameras

SFMTA says ‘capital crunch’ and dragging timelines make expanding the program cumbersome

Most Read