Crucifix is a cross Europe is not allowed to bear

A recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights held that it’s a violation of the religious and educational rights of Italian children for them to attend classes in which a crucifix hangs on the wall.

Crucifixes have traditionally been part of the decor in the once-intensely Catholic Italy. Yet, if they were ever supposed to act as silent proselytizers upon ranks of studious schoolchildren, they did not.

Italy has drifted away from the old faith — birth rates are among the lowest in Europe, and only 21 percent of Italian Catholics said they attended weekly Mass, as of 2006 — but the cross has remained, ubiquitous and familiar, a pillar of the national character.

In 2002, a Finnish-born mother of two in the Italian school system objected to the crucifixes in their classrooms. The school principal was unmoved. Italy’s Constitutional Court dismissed her complaint, so she filed a case in Strasbourg, France, which she won.

The response? Outrage, a swelling popular rebellion, even, against the prospect that because of one woman’s agitation, the entire country may have to rid its schools of a treasured symbol that as much bespeaks Italian cultural identity as it does Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.

Mayors and town councils across Italy are not only refusing to remove crucifixes from their schools, but are buying new ones and putting them up in places where they don’t already hang.

In Rome, the merchants association has reportedly urged members to put a crucifix in their shop windows. The mayor of a town called Montecchio Maggiore pitched in to buy a 6-foot crucifix and erect it at the entrance to the town hall.

“The gesture was necessary,” Mayor Milena Cecchetto said, “to defend what to us and to our country stands for tradition and is at the root of our values. Whoever wants to eliminate it is not interested in secularism, but in paving the way for other forms of religious expression.”

In the Lombardy region, schools in the League Monza have been given seven days to make sure a crucifix hangs in every classroom or face fines. The Italian education minister calls the cross a symbol of Italian tradition, saying, “No one, and certainly not an ideological European court, will succeed in erasing our identity.” Italy’s prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi said. “Our country can only be described as Christian. Even an atheist has to agree with this.”

Other Europeans are watching Italy’s situation with open alarm. The president of Poland and the leadership of the Greek Orthodox Church have been speaking out against the ban, which could ultimately apply to all European Union countries. It’s common in both Catholic Poland and in Orthodox Greece and Greek Cyprus for crucifixes or icons to be displayed in public places.

“Nobody in Poland will accept the message that you can’t hang crosses in schools,” Polish President Lech Kaczynski said this week during Independence Day festivities in Warsaw.

In the United States, we are, of course, used to this process. Tireless campaigners such as atheist Michael Newdow and the lawyerly squads at the American Civil Liberties Union have sought for years to stamp out such apparently unseemly conflations of church and state as the Pledge of Allegiance, pregame prayers and the construction of nativity scenes in public places.

In Italy, though, there’s a special irony. The European Court of Human Rights was set up after World War II by democratic free countries in an effort to avoid a repeat of what happened during the Nazi era.

The European Convention on Human Rights was written in general terms by the victorious countries to embody the ancient freedoms that, for instance, Britons enjoyed. Yet, the code is now being interpreted to ban things that free people have long enjoyed doing in their societies.

You do not have to be fond of the crucifix, or sympathetic to the outraged mayors of Italy, to find something utterly repulsive and joyless in the steady march to remove anything that might offend anyone, in the name of respect and
consistency.

Examiner Columnist Meghan Cox Gurdon is a former foreign correspondent and a regular contributor to the books pages of The Wall Street Journal.

General OpinionOpinion

Just Posted

Ahmad Ibrahim Moss, a Lyft driver whose pandemic-related unemployment benefits have stopped, is driving again and relying on public assistance to help make ends meet. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
How much does gig work cost taxpayers?

Some drivers and labor experts say Prop. 22 pushed an undue burden on to everyday taxpayers.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, who visited the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 6 headquarters on Recall Election Day, handily won after a summer of political high jinks.	<ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Lessons from a landslide: Key takeaways from California’s recall circus

‘After a summer of half-baked polls and overheated press coverage, the race wasn’t even close’

Suicide is the second leading cause of death for adolescents in the U.S. (Shutterstock)
Why California teens need mental illness education

SB 224 calls for in-school mental health instruction as depression and suicide rates rise

The Kimpton Buchanan Hotel in Japantown could become permanent supportive housing if The City can overcome neighborhood pushback. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Nimbytown: Will SF neighborhoods allow vacant hotels to house the homeless?

‘We have a crisis on our hands and we need as many options as possible’

Most Read