Boathouse plan ignores needs at lake

There is far more to the Lake Merced boathouse story than The San Francisco Examiner was able to cover in its recent article (“Lake Merced boathouse renovations revealed,” Sept. 5).

Despite the common belief that Lake Merced is a park within the legal jurisdiction of the Recreation and Park Department, it is not. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission owns Lake Merced, while Rec and Park has very limited management responsibilities for recreational activities because of an outdated agreement the SFPUC made back in 1950.

Between 2007 and 2010, the SFPUC spent $588,464 in ratepayer money having consultants prepare a 188-page “Lake Merced Watershed Report,” which can be found at SFPUC’s website by searching for “Lake Merced.” In dealing with the existing boathouse building, on Page 43 the watershed report suggests that the boathouse should be replaced rather than rehabilitated. The reason given was that there is a real need for more storage space for the boats used by hundreds of high school and adult rowers.

The $2 million renovation proposed by the SFPUC and Rec and Park that was described in The San Francisco Examiner article doesn’t provide a single square inch of additional boat storage space. Page 115 of the watershed report lays out the criteria for replacing and expanding boating-related facilities. Those criteria have been ignored in the current $2 million rehabilitation. In fact, the decision to spend $2 million renovating the existing building was made without any public input, involvement or participation. An advisory committee, including members of the public involved in the preparation of the watershed report, agreed that the old boathouse building needed to be totally replaced. Apparently they don’t count.

The existing boathouse building should have been leveled and possibly replaced by a much smaller building that could house a small  tackle shop for fishermen and a small snack bar. There is no need for a 15,200-square-foot building on the north side of the lake. The need is for more boat storage space and related facilities. A new boathouse and aquatic center should be built on a small portion of the 14-acre site across the lake currently occupied by the Pacific Rod and Gun Club. There is more than enough space for both activities at that site.

The essential problem at Lake Merced has long been, and continues to be, the two-headed management monster mentioned above, with the SFPUC and Rec and Park either getting in each other’s way, or saying that the multitude of problems and deficiencies at the lake are the other agency’s issue. The fact that nobody was really fully in charge goes a long way in explaining why city taxpayers or SFPUC ratepayers may end up picking up the $10 million cleanup bill for pollution at Lake Merced, because neither agency required the gun club to carry the proper type of pollution liability insurance.

The SFPUC should take back full and sole management responsibility and bring on a professional lake or reservoir concessionaire as is done at most recreational lakes and reservoirs in California. Examples in the Bay Area include Lake Chabot and Los Vaqueros Reservoir (both managed by Urban Park Concessionaires) and Del Valle Lake and San Pablo Reservoir (both managed by Rocky Mountain Recreation).

Jerry Cadagan co-founded the Committee to Save Lake Merced in 1993 and has worked continuously on Lake Merced issues as an unpaid volunteer since that time.

editorialsOpinion

Just Posted

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

National Weather Service flood watch in the San Francisco Bay Area for Sunday, Oct. 24, 2021. (National Weather Service via Bay City News)
Storm updates: Sunday was wettest October day in San Francisco history

Torrential rainfall causes flooding, triggers evacuations in burn areas

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A collaborative workspace for a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) in Coordinape is pictured at a recent blockchain meet up at Atlas Cafe. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Business without bosses: San Francisco innovators battle bureaucracy with blockchain

‘The next generation will work for three DAOs at the same time’

Most Read