BART’s clean agenda is welcome

Anyone who thinks Bay Area Rapid Transit is of marginal importance to our regional economy and quality of life should consider that without BART, the number of morning commute vehicles on the Bay Bridge would double from 30,000 to 60,000, dragging out commute time from 25 minutes to about three hours.

The entire Bay Area road network would be near paralysis at peak hours without BART’s 360,000 average weekday passenger trips of approximately 13 miles apiece. And by 2025, the Bay Area population is expected to add 1.6 million new residents who will increase traffic congestion by 150 percent.

Like every U.S. public transit agency, BART cannot subsist on fares alone — riders would balk at the prohibitive charges. As of now, a relatively high 65 percent of BART’s $651 million annual operating budget is paid by passenger fares, parking, advertising and other revenues. However, that still leaves a $420 million annual capital construction budget to be funded by a combination of federal allocations, local taxes and bonds, and increases of fares and fees.

Perhaps more than other systems, BART must perform a complex financial juggling act: balancing the immediate needs of providing reliable and comfortable transportation along with the long-term imperatives of maintaining and replacing equipment that has been in continuous service for as long as 35 years, plus expanding and upgrading the total system to meet a consistent growth in ridership.

BART has embarked on a decadelong, $1.3 billion earthquake safety program that will first reinforce the Transbay Tube and then strengthen the nearly 2,000 aerial supports and other critical structures.

There is also constant jockeying for a meaningful share of Homeland Security funds. And this year BART is taking early steps on a 25-year, $8 billion reinvestment program to renovate or replace nearly every element of its 35-year-old infrastructure.

With all these conflicting demands on BART resources, The Examiner is pleased that the agency recognizes the need to maintain rider comfort by sensible replacement of worn-out seats and flooring. BART directors on Thursday approved replacement of all seats and flooring in half of its 669-car fleet within two years.

BART tested stain-resistant plastic composite flooring on 80 trains for two years, much to the pleasure of riders. In order to replace the mucky carpeting, the seats had to be ripped out. So now the threadbare and sometimes-smelly wool seat-covers and foam cushions will be replaced, too, at a cost of $2.7 million.

When BART ticket sales slumped from 2001 to 2005, agency officials in 2004 surveyed riders about whether to cut back on train service or on cleaning. The preference was for service, so less was spent on train cosmetics. But as revenues rise again, BART is improving the ride experience along with transportation reliability and convenience.

Just Posted

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Most Read