Anthony verdict may mean circumstantial evidence is dead

Circumstantial evidence is apparently dead in U.S. courts, if the verdict in the Casey Anthony trial is any indication. An Orlando, Fla., jury found Anthony not guilty of either first-degree murder, manslaughter or child abuse in the death of her daughter, Caylee Anthony, three years ago.

There were no witnesses or direct evidence that Casey Anthony murdered or caused the death of little Caylee. According to news reports, a coroner ruled Caylee’s death a homicide, but her body was so decomposed that it couldn’t be determined when she died or how the homicide might have been committed.

Virtually all the evidence against Casey Anthony was circumstantial. The most damning, for my money, were the false statements she gave police and that disturbing business about not reporting Caylee’s disappearance for 31 days. If Caylee wasn’t murdered, at the hands of Casey Anthony, then why didn’t her mother report the death, and why the lies?

This is what is known as “circumstantial evidence.” It is evidence that the Orlando jury rejected. Some, such as law professor Alan Dershowitz, have praised the jurors for voting to acquit.

Appearing on Piers Morgan’s CNN show, Dershowitz said the jurors probably had reasonable doubts and that it was their duty to acquit.

Dershowitz said there are “hundreds” of inmates in America today, some on death row, convicted on far less circumstantial evidence than Orlando prosecutors had against Casey Anthony.

Marcia Clark, who was a prosecutor in the O.J. Simpson murder trial, said there was enough circumstantial evidence in that case to convict Simpson “10 times over.” In reference to the Casey Anthony trial, Clark said, “there was enough here.”

Alex Ferrer, a former Florida circuit court judge, agreed with Clark.

“The problem is the jury failed to realize the law on what reasonable doubt is,” Ferrer said on Morgan’s show. “I think the jury wanted a conviction beyond all doubt. I thought the case was proven quite convincingly by the prosecution.”

Clark followed up on Ferrer’s comments about reasonable doubt.

“Oftentimes, reasonable doubt turns into a reason to doubt,” Clark said.

It takes jurors who can’t tell the difference between a reasonable doubt and a “reason to doubt” to help deep-six the concept of circumstantial evidence in America.

I served on a jury many years ago in which the bulk of the prosecution’s case was circumstantial evidence.

“People are convicted on circumstantial evidence every day,” the prosecutor made sure to tell the jury.

I can’t say I wouldn’t have voted with those Orlando jurors to acquit Casey Anthony, but I pride myself on having a sound, mathematical mind. So I might have leaned toward conviction of manslaughter, if not murder.

I love math. I even majored in the stuff in college. As a juror with a sound, mathematical mind, I would have added up the facts in the Casey Anthony trial. I would have even formed an equation that goes something like this:

DEFENDANT IS A LIAR + DEFENDANT’S KID GOES MISSING + DEFENDANT REPORTS KID MISSING AFTER 31 DAYS + KID IS FOUND DEAD = DEFENDANT KILLED KID.

Morgan said he found it odd that Jose Baez, Casey Anthony’s lawyer, opened the trial by telling the jurors his client was a liar. In essence, Baez told the jurors that Casey Anthony lied about almost everything, except whether or not she killed Caylee. On that, Casey’s word is gospel.

Twelve jurors must have bought that nonsense.

Examiner columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to Sudan.

Gregory KaneOp Edsop-edOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Although The City has been shut down and largely empty, people have enjoyed gathering in places such as Dolores Park. <ins>(Al Saracevic/The Examiner)</ins>
Come back to San Francisco: The City needs you now

Time to get out of the house, people. The City’s been lonely… Continue reading

A surveillance camera outside Macy’s at Union Square on Tuesday, July 28, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Is the tide turning against surveillance cameras in SF?

Crime-fighting camera networks are springing up in commercial areas all around San… Continue reading

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott speaks alongside Mayor London Breed at a news conference about 2019 crime statistics at SFPD headquarters on Jan. 21, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What the media gets wrong about crime in San Francisco

By Lincoln Mitchell Special to The Examiner Seemingly every day now, you… Continue reading

Vice President Kamala Harris is under fire for her comments in Guatemala earlier this week. (Examiner file photo.)
SF immigration advocates slam Kamala Harris’ ‘betrayal’ to her past

Kamala Harris’ comments earlier this week discouraging Central Americans from traveling to… Continue reading

Youth activists with the Sunrise Movement march along a rural road during their two-week trek from Paradise to San Francisco to call attention to an increase in deadly wildfires as a result of climate change on June 2, 2021. (Photo by Brooke Anderson)
Weeks-long climate march culminates on the Golden Gate Bridge

Lola’s alarm goes off most mornings before dawn. The 17-year-old high school… Continue reading

Most Read