Abortion coverage sacrificed for nationalized health care

Throughout the health care debate, Democrats and President Barack Obama have insisted that Americans who want to maintain their current health care coverage will be able do so. Reform, Democrats said, would be a win-win, extending coverage to millions of uninsured Americans and depriving nobody of existing coverage they like.

But events this month have forced liberals to admit an inconvenient truth: Not only will health care reform force millions of Americans to change health insurance plans against their will, but those shifts could also cause millions of women to lose coverage for abortion.

The elephant in the room is the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, adopted by the House just before the passage of the Affordable Health Care for America Act. Stupak-Pitts would prohibit any taxpayer-subsidized health plan from covering elective abortions.

If the exchange mostly caters to people who currently lack health insurance altogether, there’s little reason to worry about reduced access to abortion.

But what if Obama is wrong, and people with existing abortion-inclusive insurance are moved, against their will, into exchange-traded plans that cannot cover abortions? Some businesses might find it cheaper to drop insurance coverage and let their employees buy federally subsidized insurance.

Prior to Stupak-Pitts, concerns that health reform would lead firms to change or drop health coverage were mostly voiced on the right. But last week on the Center for American Progress’ blog, a staffer warned that millions of Americans could lose their existing employer-provided abortion coverage, as employers start buying insurance through the exchange.

Planned Parenthood Action put out an alert expressing the same concerns, posing the example that “a woman working for a small graphic design firm, who currently has abortion coverage through her company’s plan, would lose it under reform if the company decides to seek more affordable coverage in the exchange.” So much for Obama’s insistence that “if you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan.”

Liberal critics of Stupak-Pitts are just admitting the obvious about health care reform. Employer-based health insurance is a legacy of tax subsidies that apply to employer-provided insurance, but not individually purchased insurance.

Any system that adds subsidies for other purchase channels will reduce the portion of Americans with employer-based coverage, and subject more Americans to whatever restrictions the government places on policies sold through the exchange. Now the left is realizing that some of those restrictions may be ones they do not find desirable.

Stupak-Pitts has forced liberals to admit that reform is not a win-win for everyone. For reform proponents, this may be an acceptable trade-off: Extending health insurance to tens of millions of Americans who currently lack coverage is an important achievement that must be weighed against the costs of reform.

Now they must consider what losses they will accept on the road to universal coverage.

Josh Barro is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

Op Edsop-edOpinion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

A sign about proposed development of the bluff at Thornton State Beach in Daly City on Friday, Feb. 26, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Retreat center proposed at popular state beach

Daly City residents oppose construction on ocean bluffs

Rev. Roland Gordon shows “The Great Cloud of Witnesses” collage mural at the Ingleside Presbyterian Church, which he began building in 1980.<ins> (</ins>
Rev. Roland Gordon preaches love in action

Pastor promotes peace, hope through art and prayer

San Francisco’s Buster Posey was back at the plate after sitting out last season due to the risk of COVID-19. (David Maialetti/Tribune News Service)
Giants struggle against Angels in first game of Spring Training

By Nick Zeller-Singh Nearly 1,000 fans gathered into a breezy Scottsdale Stadium… Continue reading

Basketball (Shutterstock)
SI alum Begovich gets his moment, but Stanford falls on Senior Day

MAPLES PAVILION — Generally speaking, Stanford’s home finale on Saturday afternoon, a… Continue reading

U.S. Attorney David Anderson announces federal firearms charges against two men for their roles in a March 2019 shooting outside the Fillmore Heritage Center in a news conference alongside SFPD staff at the Phillip Burton Federal Building on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Departing U.S. attorney predicts corruption probe will continue

David Anderson shook up City Hall as top federal prosecutor

Most Read