Water-rate system criticized

A coalition of neighborhood groups is calling a new tiered water-rate system a “family tax,” while the city agency that adopted the rate structure defends the pricing as a conservation incentive and the best way to raise money to pay for capital improvements.

Traditionally, The City’s Public Utilities Commission has charged a uniform rate per unit, or 748 gallons, of water used.

In an effort to raise money to help pay for the aging water system’s seismic upgrade and water storage improvements, the commission approved new water rates May 8, including a tiered pricing system that would impact only single family homes. The new pricing system would go into effect July 1, unless the Board of Supervisors intervenes and rejects it.

Under the new pricing system, it would cost $2.08 per unit for the first three units of water used each month, $2.50 for the fourth though tenth units and $3.83 for every additional unit. Those numbers will increase in the subsequent year to $2.28, $2.89 and $4.80. The SFPUC estimates that the average family household uses seven units of water per month.

SFPUC spokesman Tony Winnicker said the tiered rate system is meant to “encourage conservation” of water. “The income has got to come from somewhere. Conservation rates are a way to express our values of The City and conform with the best practices that the state recommends,” he said.

“This is so unfair it makes my blood boil,” said Joan Girardot, of the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods. She said the tier rates are “fundamentally unfair” because they penalize larger families, since they will have to pay more even if they are using the same amount ofwater per person as a smaller household.

SFPUC estimates that 88 percent of its water customers would wind up paying first- and second-tier rates.

Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier has requested a hearing on the water rates, which will likely take place on June 4 before the board’s Government Audit and Oversight Committee.

She said she would introduce a resolution Tuesday rejecting the water rates. The resolution could be voted on as early as June 5 by the full board, depending on the outcome of the committee hearing.

“We do see this as a tax on families,” Alioto-Pier said. “I realize [SFSFPUC has] to do something. They need to convince us that our families are not going to be unduly burdened.”

The uniform water rate for multi-family buildings would increase on July 1 from the $1.97 per unit of water to $2.48, and increase to $2.87 per unit in the subsequent year.

jsabatini@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

BART Ambassadors are being called on to assist riders in social situations that don’t require police force. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Unarmed BART ambassadors program formalized with a focus on community service

Public safety and police reform are key elements in campaigns of Board members Dufty and Simon

On Oct. 13, people lined up to vote early for the presidential election in Southlake, Texas. <ins>(Shutterstock)</ins>
<ins></ins>
Five things to watch for in the run-up to Nov. 3

Down-ballot races, as much as the presidency, will determine the future course of this nation

WeChat (Shutterstock)
U.S. District Court denies Trump request to shutdown WeChat app

A federal judge in San Francisco denied a request by the U.S.… Continue reading

School board members Gabriela Lopez (left) and Alison Collins (right) say they have been the subject of frequent hateful, racist and sexist attacks during their time on the school board. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F Examiner)
Angered by Lowell decision, SFUSD grad targets school board members with violent imagery

Facebook page depicts two women of color on board with swastikas and x-marks on their faces

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer, a former school board member, said it was ‘ridiculous’ that the school district did not yet have a plan to reopen. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supervisors demand SFUSD set a timeline for reopening

Pressure grows on district to resume in-person learning as The City’s COVID-19 case count goes down

Most Read