Voting machine vendor under fire

San Francisco’s city attorney announced Wednesday that he is prepared to sue the company that supplied The City with its voting machines, charging that the vendor’s failure to certify its machines resulted in an election day “travesty” without results because election workers are required to take extra steps to count each vote.

Although city officials have known about some of the potential certification problems with its Election Systems and Software voting system, it did not receive official notice from the state until late summer that it would not be allowed to use its AutoMARK machines for disabled voters, or tabulate votes with the optical scan machines used at the precincts.

As a result, the ballots from The City’s 561 polling sites were transferred to City Hall to be visually inspected and then fed through the election department’s central voting system. Additionally, election workers are required to “remake” a new ballot when a voter — who is allowed to rank up to three candidates for the same local office — leaves one or more of the slots blank. A complete tally of votes is not expected for several weeks.

City Attorney Dennis Herrera said he chose not to immediately pursue breach of contract charges against ES&S this summer, but wait until after the election, because he “did not want this issue to somehow lead to a crisis of voter confidence that would perhaps drive voter turnout even lower than its been.”

City officials are estimating that just more than 154,000 San Franciscans voted in this Nov. 6 election, about 37 percent of registered voters. It is down from the 60 percent voter turnout last November and the 46 percent voter turnout in 2003, when Newsom was elected.

The City sent a letter to ES&S on Wednesday demanding that the company remedy the contract breaches by paying the additional costs The City incurred — estimated at $300,000 — for the extra effort to count ballots this year; pick up the tab for costs associated with borrowing AutoMARK machines from Contra Costa County; and agree to provide San Francisco with certified AutoMARK machines in time for 2008.

If ES&S does not respond affirmatively to the demands by Nov. 19, Herrera said he would sue.

Ken Fields, a spokesman for ES&S, provided The Examiner with a statement Wednesday that said the AutoMark machines had been previously certified and that modifications to the version provided to San Francisco were “not related to the operation of the voter assist terminal.” With regards to the conditional use certification imposed on the precinct machines, Field said ES&S “met our contractual obligations to San Francisco.”

Earlier this year, a decision made by the Board of Supervisors resulted in an extension for the ES&S contract instead of an approval for a $12.6 million with a different company, Sequoia Voting Systems. At the time, some supervisors had questions about the transparency of the electronic voting machines.

Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin reactivated the approval process for the Sequoia contract last week, although it is not known if the matter will be resolved in time for the February 2008

election.

beslinger@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsLocalneighborhoods

Just Posted

A collaborative workspace for a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) in Coordinape is pictured at a recent blockchain meet up at Atlas Cafe. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Business without bosses: San Francisco innovators battle bureaucracy with blockchain

‘The next generation will work for three DAOs at the same time’

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
Plan Bay Area 2050: Analyzing an extensive regional plan that covers the next 30 years

Here are the big ticket proposals in the $1.4 trillion proposal

Pregnant women are in the high-risk category currently prioritized for booster shots in San Francisco. (Unai Huizi/Shutterstock)
What pregnant women need to know about COVID and booster shots

Inoculations for immunosuppressed individuals are recommended in the second trimester

Examiner reporter Ben Schneider drives an Arcimoto Fun Utility Vehicle along Beach Street in Fisherman’s Wharf on Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Could San Francisco’s tiny tourist cruisers become the cars of the future?

‘Fun Utility Vehicles’ have arrived in The City

Most Read