Voters’ wallets open wider

Local taxpayers must foot a bill for more than $15 million for recent school improvements they did not approve, including $3 million in payments to bond issuers, according to a civil grand jury investigation.

Throughout the last three years, seven San Mateo County school districts have essentially refinanced voter-approved bonds to pay for additional building repairs, a process that generally takes place without public knowledge, according to the report.

The refinancing into new "cash out” bonds allowed the seven districts to spend $15.56 million more than voters approved, although the money will ultimately be supplied by taxpayers, the report said. Of that money, 19 percent, or $2.95 million, was paid back to the bond issuer, leaving $12.6 million for the districts to spend on building improvements, it said.

The districts that took out the extra money include San Mateo-Foster City, Belmont-Redwood Shores, Jefferson Union High and South San Francisco. Voters originally approved $180 million worth of bonds for the seven districts.

The report did not take a position on bond refinancing but rather pushed for more awareness.

“Our position is that the voters ought to know what the heck is going on,” grand jury Foreman Gerald Yafee said.

While not responding specifically to the report, which she had not read yet, Micaela Ochoa, chief business official for the San Mateo-Foster City district, said school districts usually refinance bonds in order to pay them off sooner or reduce the interest rates.

“Most times when districts refund or refinance their bonds, the purpose is to save taxpayers money,” said Micaela Ochoa, San Mateo-Foster City chief business official. “We did [refinance our $79 million bond] and we generated savings to taxpayers. We also generated money for the district.”

Ochoa said her district’s bond, passed in 1997, was originally expected to be paid off by 2032 but refinancing has moved that date to 2023.

mrosenberg@sfexaminer.com

By the numbers

County schools “cash out” bonds, 2005-07

Seven: School districts that refinanced bonds

$186 million: Amount of original voter-approved bonds passed

$15.56 million: Extra taxpayer burden from bond refinancing

19 percent: Amount of extra money that went back to bond issuers

Source: San Mateo County civil grand jury

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

PG&E is locked in a battle with San Francisco city officials over the cost of connecting city projects using public power to the grid.<ins> (Courtesy photo)</ins>
SF challenges PG&E’s power moves

Utility uses expensive hookups to discourage public power use

Mayor London Breed said The City would pause reopening plans in order to “make sure we continue our cautious and deliberate approach.” <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
SF slows down reopening after COVID-19 cases rise

Restaurants no longer permitted to increase indoor dining capacity to 50 percent

Toilet (Shutterstock)
Table salt and poop: Testing for COVID-19 in S.F. sewage

The City’s sewers could provide an early warning of fresh outbreaks

A study published in the December 2016 Scientific Reports journal reveals that brain activity increases when people’s political beliefs are challenged. <ins>(Screenshot Scientific Reports)</ins>
Now is the time to make friends with enemies

We can be civil to others who have different political beliefs

Most Read